Going way back in my memory, the first time I can remember was :
I was in nursery school. It was nap time. We were in a gymnasium and were told we could sleep anywhere. We simply needed to grab a sleeping mat, find a place to sleep and have a nap. Ian, Shelly and myself all wanted a red blanket. But there were only two. We could not come to an agreement. The stress level rose to a chaotic state and fighting began. In that moment, the teacher intervened and dictated who of us gets a red blanket and who gets a different colour.
The most recent/current one that is occuring:
If you look at https://steemd.com/witnesses, a miner named supercomputing has taken advantage of a flaw in the algorythm for mining and currently controls 90% of the steem mining. The Developers of steem are going to have to put a hard fork in the chain to prevent this from happening again. Is there any chance that the individual will stop on his/her own?
Both of these sound trivial, but without rulers/authority, how would these two events get resolved. And ... unfortunately, I do not believe that the majority of adults act any more reasonably than children when stress/provocation is applied.
You are imagining that I suggest no rules or authority that is established voluntarily.
Steemit is voluntary, and we agree to abide the decisions of devs. We will not be jailed for not powering up, or killed for lack of upvoting.
If someone breaks this system, we voluntarily accept that the devs have authority to fix it. If you don't want to participate, no one will tax, arrest, cage you.
Anarchy doesn't mean no rules, it means no rulers. If you don't want to follow the rules of the group, you can found your own group based on your own voluntary rules...