that all sounds good in theory, but in reality ... soldiers don't serve their country, they serve the tyrants and the bankers
You are viewing a single comment's thread from:
that all sounds good in theory, but in reality ... soldiers don't serve their country, they serve the tyrants and the bankers
False. The ones who paid attention during their oath and live up to it serve the Constitution first. Once they leave the military, many still hold on to that Oath (tightly).
Aside from the progressive taxation system, I fail to see how the Constitutions principles is markedly different from the broad brush fundamentals of anarchists and voluntarists (validity of the state, aside).
To be frank, that sounds like an argument I would hear from a freshman international relations 101 discussion.
You just attempted to sum up the entirety of human conflict in one paragraph and you expect someone to swallow the entire sum of what you say as indisputable, objective, truth, regardless of nuance?
Fed scam? Check. Power from money? Check. Elected representatives voting themselves free money and power from the legislative body for campaign donations? Absolutely.
Pretending there are no enemies to America or Westerners abroad? Fatalistically foolish.
The Constitution has BECOME "some words on a piece of paper", but that doesn't change its importance in history in forging the road towards representative republics and democracies and away from monarchies. The words in that document are far more important to me than any politician past or present because its like the kernel of an Operating System. Bad mouth it all you want, but its created a nation that has churned out some brilliant scientific and business minds who have created and accomplished world changing advancements.
You think the military has more of a role in the scam of the money printing? Or the elected representatives who use that same money to buy votes from people who simply want to be taken care of their whole lives?
Also more antagonism -- "betray yourself" ; "believing the lies"... you assume I'm ignorant or a fool. Based on your arguments, I just assume your perspective is limited and your belief system can't allow any competing information to enter without feeling the need to lash out at the messenger. I don't think you're ignorant or a fool at all, but I get the sense you feel that way about me.
To that point -- how old are you? I would guess early 20's. This matters because of the 'perspective' thing I mentioned
@luminousvisions - right into the ad hominems. Game. Set. Match.
Have a nice life.