source1 Official
source2 --- @daio
Our web pages and their contents are subject to German copyright law. Unless expressly permitted by law (§ 44a et seq. of the copyright law), every form of utilizing, reproducing or processing works subject to copyright protection on our web pages requires the prior consent of the respective owner of the rights. Individual reproductions of a work are allowed only for private use, so must not serve either directly or indirectly for earnings. Unauthorized utilization of copyrighted works is punishable (§ 106 of the copyright law).
Previous Art Plagiarism Cases by the User
This is the source mentioned by @Daio
Therefore the source mentioned by Daio is fake
Waiting for the permission from the true author of the artwork we refer to the original source via link, so as not to be accused of violating the copyright to monetize and, to be as honest as possible, we won't even put the fraudulent image created by @daio but only the link at her post, so she can't say that we benefit from stolen works but anyone who reads and evaluates this article can still see that we do not tell lies
This is @ilgiaguaro,
Reporting directly from the Jungle.
Onwards!
On what grounds do you manitize my paintings?
I forbid to use my art in my posts !!!
I, AS AN AUTHOR, DO NOT PERSONALLY USE MY PERSONAL ART !!!
Thank you for removing my art! And do not use my art anymore!
! Leave me alone!
Stop creating lots of pages and vote for yourself!
And finally learn that plagiarism is the appropriation of someone else's work !!!
its ok now? :)
the fact that you deleted my art - yes
The fact that you accuse me of plagiarism is not! :)
the fact is that even after the conversation with @logic you are pretending to be the original author of a work that doesn't really belong to you, I don't really understand if you don't get it or if you do it on purpose.. you can't make copies of an artwork and pretending to call it "my art", especially without mentioning the source, in particular when this is copyrighted. This is as if after taking a Rihanna song and accelerating a little the beating I published it and say: here is my music. Do you think it would be right?
I put in the source!
There are many of these sources!
so ok? :) I was asked to draw Frida Kahlo ! if I paint a picture, it means that this is my work but not my idea! This is an artistic reciprocity! But I understood you! I inserted the source not on the model, but on the photo from where I found it! right?
Not exactly, in the source you have reported an image that someone reported on pinterest, the real source is this one. As you can also see by browsing the artist's website It is a copyrighted work, which the artist does not give free, but sells. So in order to create a work derived from this you should have Nettsch's permission. Otherwise, gaining through a derivative work is absolutely wrong, and liable to be legally persecuted.
oops))))I was inspired by this photo, not someone's art!
I also have a question, just out of curiosity. Why is this site selling these paintings? They sell a portrait, but they do not have permission to earn money on Frida Kahlo’s face!
Frida Kahlo's face is not protected by copyright, but her works are
Congratulations @ilgiaguaro! You have completed the following achievement on the Steem blockchain and have been rewarded with new badge(s) :
You can view your badges on your Steem Board and compare to others on the Steem Ranking
If you no longer want to receive notifications, reply to this comment with the word
STOPTo support your work, I also upvoted your post!
Do not miss the last post from @steemitboard:
Vote for @Steemitboard as a witness to get one more award and increased upvotes!