Not exactly, in the source you have reported an image that someone reported on pinterest, the real source is this one. As you can also see by browsing the artist's website It is a copyrighted work, which the artist does not give free, but sells. So in order to create a work derived from this you should have Nettsch's permission. Otherwise, gaining through a derivative work is absolutely wrong, and liable to be legally persecuted.
You are viewing a single comment's thread from:
oops))))I was inspired by this photo, not someone's art!
Good, now do the same for all your work!!!!
Good luck!!
don't insult my intelligence, in your first article you make clear reference to this page In which Nettsch's painting is clearly visible, And don't waste time changing it because thanks to the blockchain I can still see what was written before and all the changes you make. Don't think I'm an idiot because I assure you it's not like that. Look at the position of the parrots, it is obviously the same as Nettsch's painting, very different from the photography you showed
Spam!
jaguarista (49) · 14 часов назад
don't insult my intelligence, in your first article you make clear reference to this page In which Nettsch's painting is clearly visible, And don't waste time changing it because thanks to the blockchain I can still see what was written before and all the changes you make. Don't think I'm an idiot because I assure you it's not like that. Look at the position of the parrots, it is obviously the same as Nettsch's painting, very different from the photography you showed
$0.00
6 голосов
Ответить