While Assassination can seem a solution
Non-Aggression Principle deems pollution
If there were a way to justify such act
Could it be never stopping would be fact
Cyberpunk is a William Gibson creation
From the book Neuromancer a migration
When do we resort to assassination as the way?
Is it true one death to save many saves the day?
Where does that fit within our Anarchist mind
Are there times it is morally acceptable we will find?
Today with crypto-currency and the blockchain
This is indeed possible, yet do we think it sane?
There are plenty of people I'd like to see dead
Yet how long before others pay also for my head?
This is still a hard problem from the morality stance
Let us debate and solve this, let us all dance
Jim Bell did address the Non Aggression Principle. His suggestion that his system is form of self defence holds some weight, but its hard to imagine that such a system would be abused.
Self defense against regime that exists
Sure I can see that being a case
Yet once it is gone would not this persist?
Once this tool is aimed at my face
Would it still truly be used in self defense
Perhaps they don't like my garden
You see on this tool I am on the fence
I could simply be replacing the warden