You are viewing a single comment's thread from:

RE: Vaccines do not cause Autism ?

in #autism7 years ago

Your first paragraph is so nonsensical, I had to check whether my coffee had been doped, I thought I was repeatedly misreading it.

"you can't fight what you determine to be misinformation with misinformation. And I quote: "estimated" to have prevented....732,000? What if their estimates were completely made up? That's really what an estimate is, just a guess."

What on earth are you on about mate? He clearly stated that that is a "statistic", if you can call it that, from sources provided by the @truthtrain itself. The point is it's a bullshit stat. An estimate is not a guess, jesus christ. An estimate requires a certain amount of calculation, a guess does not.

Sort:  

Feel free to cut and paste the "clearly stated is a statistic" because I do not see that stated anywhere. Keep shovelling....

I'll do it here for you since you struggle to comprehend what you read - it is a statistic, supplied by TruthTrain(sic) as part of his argument. I did not present the information, I merely extracted from what he supplied. It is TruthTrain that you need to direct the questions to as he supplied the information.

My sincerest apologies chief, I made the assumption you'd be able to understand that from what was said.

Well that settles it. Because agrestic and johngreenfield think it's ok.......even though Corrupt British drug giant GlaxoSmithKline was found in EU court documents to have known their vaccine caused autism.....I guess I'll go get stabbed in the arm. What could go wrong?

According to NaturalNews.com, that well known reputable source of scientific news.

I counter with: https://www.skepticalraptor.com/skepticalraptorblog.php/italian-court-awards-compensation-autism-problem-unreliable-expert/

"There is also no evidence connecting any of them to autism, and for one of them – thimerosal – there is abundant evidence to the contrary."

Apparently just pasting links to third party sites is all that is needed to refute a claim.

Edit: Also unable to verify the part where GSK admit their vaccine causes autism, 404
http://www.gsk.ca/english/docs-pdf/product-monographs/infanrix-hexa.pdf

oh and I do believe that does in fact settle the argument that the "statistic" that you had issues with was after all from a source provided by @truthtrain

This is becoming like something out of the twilight zone, maybe you guys are from a parallel dimension where Big Pharma and the NWO are intentionally infecting kids with fungi through the vaccines.

And john is a reliable expert ?

On whether your sources provided that bullshit statistic? Erm, I guess so?

Enlighten me, what exactly qualifies you to make such bold claims?

Not bad.....but, the damaging GSK Report IS available on the link you posted and was evidence in the case. Going to get my shot now...wish me well.

404 error for me buddy, wanna download it and host it elsewhere for me to peruse? There's a supposed screenshot, but since the fabled document doesn't exist, it's validity comes into question, although I'm sure you disagree with that

haha holy shit, are you for real? I looked through that document, autism is mentioned 11 times, and wanna know what it says? No or unresolved, it doesn't prove a direct link at all.

I wasn't the Judge Brother, I'm just sharing the "facts" of the case. From the article YOU provided...