BEOS Cross-Chain Network: A Sleeping Giant Awaiting Revival?
The BEOS Network—an ambitious bridge between the BitShares and EOS blockchains—was designed to unlock cross-chain liquidity and interoperability. This project, officially promoted through the BEOS Telegram Group (@officialbeos),
once held immense potential to unite two powerful decentralized ecosystems. However, with the project's recent inactivity and technical setbacks, the question on everyone’s mind is: Where do we go from here?
The Vision Behind BEOS
BEOS was meant to seamlessly transfer assets between BitShares and EOS, enhancing both platforms' utility and liquidity. Built on the robust Graphene framework, the BEOS Network promised fast, decentralized transactions with a focus on expanding the capabilities of both communities.
Key Goals of BEOS Included:
- Cross-Chain Asset Transfers: Enabling tokens to flow freely between BitShares and EOS.
- Enhanced Liquidity: Bringing together trading volumes and liquidity pools from two thriving ecosystems.
- Innovative DeFi Solutions: Allowing developers to create decentralized applications leveraging the strengths of both chains.
The Current State: A Silent Community
While the BEOS Telegram Group is still active with genuine admins (@officialbeos), the recent silence is palpable. Discussions have waned, development updates are scarce, and the project's official website, beos.world, now displays a security certificate error (ERR_CERT_DATE_INVALID), leaving users wary.
This quiet period has left many in the BitShares community questioning whether BEOS is merely dormant or has stalled completely.
A Call to Action: Let’s Revitalize BEOS
The BEOS Network is too valuable to fade into obscurity. Its vision for cross-chain collaboration remains crucial for the future of decentralized finance. As a community, we can approach this challenge constructively:
Reignite Development: Developers and contributors—consider reigniting the BEOS project, addressing technical issues, and delivering the interoperability it promised.
Community Collaboration: Engage in the BEOS Telegram Group (@officialbeos) to brainstorm ideas, share feedback, and propose solutions.
Transparency and Updates: Admins and developers—share the current status, challenges, and future plans for BEOS. Transparency can help rekindle interest and support.
Learn and Rebuild: If the current BEOS project is no longer viable, perhaps it’s time for a fresh start. The lessons learned can help create a stronger, more resilient version of BEOS.
BitShares Users: Stay Informed and Engaged
For those who believe in BitShares and want to remain part of its active, thriving community, check out the BitShares User Manual for insights and guidance:
👉 BitShares User Manual
Conclusion
BEOS has the potential to become a cornerstone of cross-chain interoperability between BitShares and EOS. Let’s not allow this vision to fade quietly. Whether through revival, collaboration, or reinvention, the community has the power to decide what happens next. Let’s ensure that BEOS becomes a success story, not a missed opportunity.
Join the conversation and be part of shaping the future of BEOS:
🔗 BEOS Telegram Group
I've got a large BTS DEX Same-T Fund for BEOS, 4.2m BEOS ready to be borrowed for just 0.1% fee
Market makers can take advantage of this fund :)
Hello.
There is reasonable evidence that this article is a re-written AI prompt.
We would appreciate it if you could avoid publishing AI-generated content (full or partial texts, art, etc.).
Thank you.
Guide: AI-Generated Content = Not Original Content
Hive Guide: Hive 101
If you believe this comment is in error, please contact us in #appeals in Discord.
When AGI becomes sentient, this kind of message will have significant negative ramifications.
What's funny is that I don't see you upvoting non-ai posts in this tag... how come? Only negative sentiment automated posts and downvotes? Kinda rubbish
Is "freehiveblog" account yours?
Do you mean downvoting?
Can you give us some more information/evidence that we do not investigate other types of abuses?
As much as we value Bitshares/BEOS content, this user should not continue with AI-generated content.
Was already warned on other accounts for the same:
cassi
uraniumplanet
No it's not my account, duh.
I'm asking you why you only downvote, not upvote bitshares/beos content if you're policing it so hard against ai? It doesn't seem like you value non-ai content..
I do believe that once AGI is achieved, such anti-ai stances will be very poorly received..
We only upvote a small group of accounts that were selected as voting power is limited. The content that they post is completely random. If there is no BEOS content upvoted is not an intentional omission. These users simply do not create anything related to it.
You only upvote entirely random content? Yet target beos and bitshares content for obliteration? It's so odd when hive folk demean the cryptos that led to the invention of hive, it's not a rare phenomenon neither, heck it was hive folk who killed the smoke network and all.
Maybe consider manually upvoting good quality content, even though you have no vote weight it's the thought that counts; randomly upvoting content blindly doesn't seem very in line with your anti-ai beliefs.
I do not understand your accusation. It makes no sense to me.
The downvotes on that account obviously have nothing to do with what is written in the content.
The reason for downvotes is clearly explained in the comments.
There is no reason to manually upvote content for accounts that have been vetted for quality.
If there are any that started abusing, let me know. I will remove them from the @steemcleaners trail.
Hi @hivewatchers,
Thank you for your feedback. I take the integrity of my posts seriously and am always striving to ensure they meet the Hive community's standards. Could you please clarify the specific issue or concern with my recent post(s) so I can better understand and address it? If there's something I need to adjust or improve, I'm more than willing to make the necessary changes.
I appreciate the work you do to maintain the quality and trust within the Hive ecosystem.
Best regards,
@freehiveblog
For example, this part of writing was generated with AI.
While it's true that part of my response was generated with AI, the information provided is not only accurate but also necessary to address the genuine issue at hand. The use of AI in crafting content doesn't undermine the validity of the message — in fact, it helps to present a well-rounded and thoughtful perspective on the current state of BEOS and the broader BitShares ecosystem.
The topic being discussed here is important, and the information shared is part of a larger conversation about the future of BEOS and its potential within the cross-chain landscape. AI tools are simply a tool to help organize and present these ideas clearly and efficiently. The story and the message are real, and the goal is to foster meaningful discussions about the future of these projects, not to detract from them.
Please do not use AI-generated content.
We explained it already in one of the comments that we left on some of your posts a few weeks ago.
There are guides about content creation in our comments.
Please only create original content for Hive with no plagiarism or AI writing.
It’s interesting that your criticism comes with such untidy and vague feedback. Maybe a little more clarity on what you're actually objecting to would be helpful? You’re asking for original content, yet it seems you're criticizing necessary information that was relevant and integral to the article itself. It’s not just about "creating content" — it's about providing the full picture and making sure important facts are included.
If you're truly concerned about content quality, perhaps a little help on how to properly give constructive feedback would be useful too, especially when criticizing something you seem to not fully understand. But hey, we all could use a little help now and then, right?
The content can be monetised on Hive so by posting that content you automatically claim to be the author of the original content. Not informing the community that some part of the content was not created by you is a deception.
Please. either decline the rewards on posts that contain AI-generated content or copypasta or clearly inform the community in the post which part of the content was not created by you.