Hello.
There is reasonable evidence that this article is a re-written AI prompt.
We would appreciate it if you could avoid publishing AI-generated content (full or partial texts, art, etc.).
Thank you.
Guide: AI-Generated Content = Not Original Content
Hive Guide: Hive 101
If you believe this comment is in error, please contact us in #appeals in Discord.
When AGI becomes sentient, this kind of message will have significant negative ramifications.
What's funny is that I don't see you upvoting non-ai posts in this tag... how come? Only negative sentiment automated posts and downvotes? Kinda rubbish
No it's not my account, duh.
I'm asking you why you only downvote, not upvote bitshares/beos content if you're policing it so hard against ai? It doesn't seem like you value non-ai content..
I do believe that once AGI is achieved, such anti-ai stances will be very poorly received..
You only upvote entirely random content? Yet target beos and bitshares content for obliteration? It's so odd when hive folk demean the cryptos that led to the invention of hive, it's not a rare phenomenon neither, heck it was hive folk who killed the smoke network and all.
Maybe consider manually upvoting good quality content, even though you have no vote weight it's the thought that counts; randomly upvoting content blindly doesn't seem very in line with your anti-ai beliefs.
What I'm getting at is your content seems to be solely negative, and that is more detrimental to hive than ai based content poses.
Hive should be a top 100 crypto, yet it's failing to gain a foothold.
Perhaps a more positive purpose on this blockchain would be more beneficial, especially considering I've seen no support for parent dpos chains coming from you or your associates.
Hi @hivewatchers,
Thank you for your feedback. I take the integrity of my posts seriously and am always striving to ensure they meet the Hive community's standards. Could you please clarify the specific issue or concern with my recent post(s) so I can better understand and address it? If there's something I need to adjust or improve, I'm more than willing to make the necessary changes.
I appreciate the work you do to maintain the quality and trust within the Hive ecosystem.
Best regards,
@freehiveblog
While it's true that part of my response was generated with AI, the information provided is not only accurate but also necessary to address the genuine issue at hand. The use of AI in crafting content doesn't undermine the validity of the message — in fact, it helps to present a well-rounded and thoughtful perspective on the current state of BEOS and the broader BitShares ecosystem.
The topic being discussed here is important, and the information shared is part of a larger conversation about the future of BEOS and its potential within the cross-chain landscape. AI tools are simply a tool to help organize and present these ideas clearly and efficiently. The story and the message are real, and the goal is to foster meaningful discussions about the future of these projects, not to detract from them.
Now I see the nonsense you need to deal with! Not using AI seems pretty easy to understand. Odd reply’s above.
Hey I don’t think I heard back my last reply. I have addressed the issue and my latest post was still zeroed out. Can you please remove me from list? I immediately took action and ceased the action. I have limited reward to $1 or $2 if I only write a couple paragraphs and no posts since are only a video link. I have taken the issue seriously and not repeated since you first reached out. Thank you! @hivewatchers
Example. My post yesterday was my own writing and also reward limited to $2. It was still zeroed out.
I would appreciate being removed from black list. I took action immediately to cease the issue addressed and totally understand the issue. Thank you so much.
@steemcleaners
It’s interesting that your criticism comes with such untidy and vague feedback. Maybe a little more clarity on what you're actually objecting to would be helpful? You’re asking for original content, yet it seems you're criticizing necessary information that was relevant and integral to the article itself. It’s not just about "creating content" — it's about providing the full picture and making sure important facts are included.
If you're truly concerned about content quality, perhaps a little help on how to properly give constructive feedback would be useful too, especially when criticizing something you seem to not fully understand. But hey, we all could use a little help now and then, right?
A whole $0.00, wow 😂