TOP 200 effective Steemit сurators that encourage discussion for the 2017.09.08

[boddhisattva]

I want to share with you statistics about the most effective Steemit curators.

This statistic is not about how much the authors or curators have earned. This statistics shows the list of curators, whose contribution to the reward pool distribution is the most significant.

image source

---

What does this mean?

You can say that there is nothing interesting in this statistics. That it is clear that the reward pool is distributed by whales. But!

The most interesting thing is how the curator distributes the reward pool. He can vote only for his posts and his comments. He can vote for a selected circle of authors and affiliated accounts. But also he can vote for a large number of authors who publish interesting content.

Thus, an effective curator is a curator who has sufficient Steem Power (he can be an investor or a popular author who has earned his Steem Power by publishing interesting content), devoting time and effort to the content curating at Steemit and distributing a reward pool in favor of the authors. And the efficiency level is estimated by how much SBD curator distributes among as many authors as possible.

But this time we will review those curators who reward the discussions, that is, they vote for the comments of other users.

According to the ideology of the Steemit creators, the discussion is as valuable an element as the author's content. Confirmation of this is the allocation of a separate pool of awards for comments.

---

How it works?

Votes - Each curator distributes a certain part of the reward pool with his votes (upvote / flag).

Authors - This part of the pool he distributes between a certain number of authors.

VAS (vote average strength) - For general awareness, we can estimate the average vote strength in percents (%), with which the curator votes.

Contr. (SBD) (Contribution in SBD) - The distributed part of the pool is the contribution of the curator, it is calculated in SBD. In this case, the author's reward is taken into account. The curator's reward is not taken into account.

Share % - The percentage of the of the curator contribution among the contributions of all curators, we can also estimate for information purposes in %.

Eff. - The effectiveness of the curator is estimated in conventional units and is calculated as follows.

The total number of authors who published rewarded comments for the period under study is determined.
Then the contribution of the curator is divided by the total number of authors, and then multiplied by the number of authors for whom the curator voted for the period.

Thus, we see that, having distributed even a smaller number of SBD between a larger number of authors, the curator can be more effective than other curators. At the same time, having a greater voice power, but not actively voting, supporting a small number of authors, the curator takes a lower position in the rating.

And now, statistics.

---

4816 authors published their rewarded comments during this day.

5005 accounts participated in the comments curating according to information from the database.

43649 votes were made during this day.

4363,99 SBD - is the total author rewards for this day.

---

TOP-200 effective comments curators for September 8, 2017

№	Account	Votes	Authors	VAS(%)	Contr. (SBD)	Share %	Eff.
1	@surpassinggoogle	207	137	1	184,08	4,22	5,24
2	@good-karma	178	178	0	66,85	1,53	2,47
3	@gentlebot	74	71	100	75,8	1,74	1,12
4	@jesta	1488	85	0	42,49	0,97	0,75
5	@thing-2	73	69	100	44,19	1,01	0,63
6	@broncnutz	80	63	6	40,71	0,93	0,53
7	@kaylinart	38	34	24	53,23	1,22	0,38
8	@randowhale	131	15	2	110,37	2,53	0,34
9	@randowhale1	99	15	2	90,4	2,07	0,28
10	@donkeypong	32	31	3	41,7	0,96	0,27
11	@alexbeyman	37	33	100	37,83	0,87	0,26
12	@simonjones	9	2	100	544,82	12,48	0,23
13	@pharesim	57	45	0	23,03	0,53	0,22
14	@mexbit	29	15	67	44,25	1,01	0,14
15	@adm	247	2	2	298,51	6,84	0,12
16	@esteemapp	174	174	1	3,43	0,08	0,12
17	@noisy	12	9	85	59,4	1,36	0,11
18	@bitcoiner	176	176	1	2,76	0,06	0,1
19	@awgbibb	40	37	10	13,28	0,3	0,1
20	@kevinwong	37	35	3	13,9	0,32	0,1
21	@gamer00	62	31	10	13,94	0,32	0,09
22	@timcliff	41	35	7	12,95	0,3	0,09
23	@craig-grant	4	4	100	93,08	2,13	0,08
24	@swisswatcher	178	178	1	1,83	0,04	0,07
25	@midnas-howler	24	23	5	13,9	0,32	0,07
26	@streetstyle	29	25	10	12,64	0,29	0,07
27	@canadian-coconut	19	16	2	20,22	0,46	0,07
28	@feruz	177	176	1	1,77	0,04	0,06
29	@deanliu	18	18	32	16,09	0,37	0,06
30	@nippel66	40	22	52	13,26	0,3	0,06
31	@tommyhansen	18	13	36	23,74	0,54	0,06
32	@stackin	55	50	2	5,01	0,11	0,05
33	@ackza	48	40	20	6,56	0,15	0,05
34	@cryptoeagle	48	29	52	7,71	0,18	0,05
35	@ramta	14	13	5	20,16	0,46	0,05
36	@mattclarke	30	21	37	11,8	0,27	0,05
37	@lichtblick	84	57	1	4,15	0,1	0,05
38	@matt-a	25	16	4	15,12	0,35	0,05
39	@vandeberg	5	5	50	35,52	0,81	0,04
40	@chance777	59	20	34	9,18	0,21	0,04
41	@exyle	20	17	4	10,08	0,23	0,04
42	@happymoneyman	40	30	7	6,93	0,16	0,04
43	@hilarski	35	32	12	6,73	0,15	0,04
44	@elyaque	41	40	3	4,51	0,1	0,04
45	@eric-boucher	48	22	14	8,13	0,19	0,04
46	@surfyogi	15	15	8	13,24	0,3	0,04
47	@teamsteem	14	13	2	14,88	0,34	0,04
48	@blocktrades	3	3	5	71,37	1,64	0,04
49	@moala	14	2	100	88,59	2,03	0,04
50	@mammasitta	38	36	8	5,45	0,12	0,04
51	@anu	26	26	6	5,44	0,12	0,03
52	@michaelstobiersk	54	41	47	3,58	0,08	0,03
53	@asmolokalo	18	12	100	13,06	0,3	0,03
54	@tipu	32	12	26	10,45	0,24	0,03
55	@thecryptofiend	39	36	2	3,92	0,09	0,03
56	@xiknybuc	8	4	100	32,94	0,75	0,03
57	@floridasnail	39	30	15	4,28	0,1	0,03
58	@carterx7	23	17	28	9,67	0,22	0,03
59	@dyuryul	20	17	5	7,56	0,17	0,03
60	@xpilar	41	19	4	6,49	0,15	0,03
61	@extrospect	7	1	100	121,2	2,78	0,03
62	@paco	28	8	48	18,03	0,41	0,03
63	@everittdmickey	50	22	9	5,52	0,13	0,03
64	@hanshotfirst	28	26	1	4,71	0,11	0,03
65	@creadordelfuturo	30	23	5	5,71	0,13	0,03
66	@jaytop	27	26	28	6,14	0,14	0,03
67	@dragosroua	33	30	10	3	0,07	0,02
68	@rebeccaryan	17	15	25	5,28	0,12	0,02
69	@bubke	15	14	49	6,83	0,16	0,02
70	@jwolf	24	24	2	4,23	0,1	0,02
71	@lyndsaybowes	22	15	8	7,16	0,16	0,02
72	@roadscape	3	3	12	30,24	0,69	0,02
73	@uwelang	36	27	11	4,22	0,1	0,02
74	@barbro	22	15	9	6,85	0,16	0,02
75	@raybrockman	34	30	7	3,69	0,08	0,02
76	@cryptoctopus	9	9	5	8,1	0,19	0,02
77	@htliao	10	10	1	7,93	0,18	0,02
78	@overkillcoin	33	22	15	3,97	0,09	0,02
79	@ctrl-alt-nwo	31	17	1	5,13	0,12	0,02
80	@kafkanarchy84	27	22	9	4,64	0,11	0,02
81	@twinner	35	27	1	3,88	0,09	0,02
82	@libertyteeth	21	14	12	8,22	0,19	0,02
83	@steevc	57	26	6	4,44	0,1	0,02
84	@fulltimegeek	10	7	3	14,29	0,33	0,02
85	@ulfr	25	12	39	8,5	0,19	0,02
86	@onceuponatime	5	5	14	18,21	0,42	0,02
87	@davebrewer	12	10	27	11,04	0,25	0,02
88	@inventor16	29	24	50	4,1	0,09	0,02
89	@acidyo	9	9	1	9,55	0,22	0,02
90	@enki	10	10	4	3,44	0,08	0,01
91	@double-u	15	8	55	7,69	0,18	0,01
92	@camilla	6	4	52	7,36	0,17	0,01
93	@transisto	2	2	20	18,77	0,43	0,01
94	@greenjuice	24	22	5	1,98	0,05	0,01
95	@joeblack1	30	12	1	2,21	0,05	0,01
96	@lighthil	9	5	100	9,9	0,23	0,01
97	@riskdebonair	8	7	65	3,94	0,09	0,01
98	@quinneaker	32	25	4	1,63	0,04	0,01
99	@infovore	6	5	9	7,62	0,17	0,01
100	@elewarne	9	9	100	3,24	0,07	0,01
101	@rudystyle	10	1	100	43,46	1	0,01
102	@lightsplasher	9	8	47	7,04	0,16	0,01
103	@enomujjass	28	20	8	2,44	0,06	0,01
104	@nanzo-scoop	4	2	26	30,33	0,7	0,01
105	@richreck	14	9	66	4,31	0,1	0,01
106	@dexter-k	28	20	3	2,68	0,06	0,01
107	@dennisschroeder	20	4	100	12,36	0,28	0,01
108	@schamangerbert	24	19	6	1,76	0,04	0,01
109	@steemit-life	17	17	13	2,25	0,05	0,01
110	@stellabelle	2	2	100	24,7	0,57	0,01
111	@jiahn	73	28	30	1,54	0,04	0,01
112	@toktok	10	10	28	2,6	0,06	0,01
113	@meesterboom	40	27	1	1,62	0,04	0,01
114	@kus-knee	14	12	3	2,41	0,06	0,01
115	@klye	39	26	2	2	0,05	0,01
116	@lykencrypto	14	10	51	3,03	0,07	0,01
117	@enginewitty	37	22	10	1,33	0,03	0,01
118	@abh12345	65	38	11	1,2	0,03	0,01
119	@tjpezlo	16	11	100	2,78	0,06	0,01
120	@surfermarly	7	7	41	5,26	0,12	0,01
121	@diskorvery	8	5	38	7,45	0,17	0,01
122	@uplus	6	2	100	18,51	0,42	0,01
123	@travelwithus	52	34	35	1,44	0,03	0,01
124	@geronimo	17	5	79	6,3	0,14	0,01
125	@thedamus	33	18	44	3,91	0,09	0,01
126	@mynewsteemit	5	1	100	25,16	0,58	0,01
127	@boatymcboatface	8	7	10	5,1	0,12	0,01
128	@steemit-health	20	17	13	1,5	0,03	0,01
129	@britt.the.ish	11	1	100	39,24	0,9	0,01
130	@jerrybanfield	15	15	9	2,25	0,05	0,01
131	@khaiyoui	16	13	5	1,92	0,04	0,01
132	@inuk	28	1	100	26,05	0,6	0,01
133	@paolobeneforti	16	16	11	1,65	0,04	0,01
134	@greatpath	12	12	5	4,8	0,11	0,01
135	@ryanhkr	31	24	5	1,21	0,03	0,01
136	@d-pend	32	22	2	1,47	0,03	0,01
137	@arcange	2	2	3	0,06	0	0
138	@kayceesuave	1	0	100	0,01	0	0
139	@goofyu	4	4	100	0,64	0,01	0
140	@roelandp	1	1	1	0,29	0,01	0
141	@bareknowledge	2	2	100	0	0	0
142	@raphaelle	2	2	3	0,01	0	0
143	@forcesteem	1	1	100	0	0	0
144	@sauravrungta	2	2	100	5,64	0,13	0
145	@faranfani	2	0	100	0	0	0
146	@punzee	3	3	100	0	0	0
147	@chipnoreo	2	2	100	0	0	0
148	@pogoland	1	1	100	0,06	0	0
149	@bandana-gramma	1	1	100	0	0	0
150	@smetana	4	4	100	0	0	0
151	@irfanullah	1	1	100	0,01	0	0
152	@darksamus288	1	1	100	0,01	0	0
153	@alvorek	2	1	100	0,02	0	0
154	@gre3n	3	3	100	0,09	0	0
155	@andreacervantes	2	2	100	0	0	0
156	@tallyho	1	1	100	0	0	0
157	@catchup	1	1	100	0	0	0
158	@hot-girls	1	1	100	0,09	0	0
159	@disarrangedjane	5	4	100	0,05	0	0
160	@awesome-seven	2	2	20	0,08	0	0
161	@roncrowder	1	1	100	0	0	0
162	@alex-icey	1	1	100	0,04	0	0
163	@emmadetemmy	3	3	100	0	0	0
164	@kbcndh6b	2	2	100	0	0	0
165	@ibklimpak	2	2	100	0	0	0
166	@jokerpravis	1	1	100	0,26	0,01	0
167	@sanj	21	9	100	0	0	0
168	@madhatt	1	0	100	0	0	0
169	@rulesforrebels	2	2	64	0,18	0	0
170	@zx9c99	1	1	100	0	0	0
171	@killuminatic	4	3	55	0,25	0,01	0
172	@nationall	5	4	100	0	0	0
173	@nickmorphew	2	1	100	0,06	0	0
174	@talk2momz	2	2	100	0	0	0
175	@earnonlinewith	1	0	100	0,03	0	0
176	@rickyadiputra	1	1	100	0	0	0
177	@ali-butt	1	1	100	0	0	0
178	@leaving-egypt	3	3	100	0	0	0
179	@harryp3	1	1	100	0	0	0
180	@kriptofondas	2	2	100	0	0	0
181	@motivator	1	1	41	0,03	0	0
182	@li21	2	1	100	0	0	0
183	@rftube	1	0	100	0	0	0
184	@tom-stefan	1	1	100	0	0	0
185	@alktoni	3	3	100	0,31	0,01	0
186	@alexandrecseco	2	2	100	0	0	0
187	@lelek	1	1	100	0	0	0
188	@anubhavbhadani	1	1	100	0	0	0
189	@argd88	10	2	100	0	0	0
190	@rafalski	1	0	100	0	0	0
191	@africanlottery	1	1	100	0	0	0
192	@sift666	2	1	54	0,78	0,02	0
193	@necrophagist	5	0	100	0,39	0,01	0
194	@pcso	1	1	100	0	0	0
195	@davidstrohmer	1	1	100	0	0	0
196	@malonmar	5	4	15	0,2	0	0
197	@geneeverett	3	2	34	0,26	0,01	0
198	@biggeetx	1	1	100	0	0	0
199	@shyuan	4	4	100	0	0	0
200	@mesbaimicta	58	46	100	0	0	0

---

Now you know all these heroes. Their daily work increases the interest in the discussion, gives hope to some authors, and some even a decent income. Their work attracts new authors in Steemit and makes existing users remain.

---

Information sources

All information is prepared by querying data from a SteemSQL - SQL database containing information from Steem's blockchain, as well as by calculations based on this data.

Special thanks to @arcange for SteemSQL and for the advice provided to me during the development of this project.

Comments

[jaraumoses]

These curators are really legends and this quote below summarizes my thoughts.

Their daily work increases the interest in the discussion, gives hope to some authors, and some even a decent income. Their work attracts new authors in Steemit and makes existing users remain.

They mosty make existing authors remain and earn a few cents.

[boddhisattva]

Yes, they are doing a good job while we have not so good times in steemit.

[sift666]

Apart from all the spam and some fake accounts, is there something else I don't know about?

[boddhisattva]

It seems to me that users do not actively vote for each other. They spend all their energy on attracting the attention of rich accounts

[sift666]

True! - I think there are some experienced users who are actively voting and making worthwhile comments. while the vast majority of new users are just posting rubbish and making a futile attempt to make a few cents.

But I'm not too worried because they have no voting power at all, and although they are irritating, I don't think they will last long or change anything.

[surpassinggoogle]

In my case, it is all manual and i know the spam comments cos i am there in the conversation. I also look at intention and try sift good from the not-so-good. It takes work but it does work to keep the ecosystem going. Too, i don't want much community isolation and i try to spread votes a lot more in the comments, to reach as many steemians as possible.

[serkagan]

Everything is very logical, any action carries a certain result, the more actions to maintain the ecosystem, the better for all participants.

[droucil]

The fact that you are number #1 and doing everything manually is really something special. From the top 10 I believe half are bots and it's likely the others are using something like steemvoter. Not that I say there is anything wrong with that, as it is a lot of work to do everything manually (I use it myself). But if more people where to do such an oustanding job it would greatly benefit the community!

[samiwhyte]

Spreading vote across the conversation make people take conversation seriously

[honourmaus]

And exactly, that is where you are different, you do say “you are lazy to quit” and I realized that you always surface in a place to give encouragement, anybody you visit his/her blog will be happy together with those who left a nice comment too........ You are a blessing...... Thanks for never being tired to keep promoting the community, I hope to add you retain the number spot of this category

[boddhisattva]

I agree with you. Most likely, many of them will soon leave

[kingyus]

I have bots of some of this great curators voting me for some reason I am not sure,..probably will vote this comment...probably..maybe...lol so thank you for your bots in any case!!! :D

[overkillcoin]

I can't believe it!

I'm grateful to see that we're having an impact and this is motivation to continue doing so. Congratulations to all, you have my seal of approval.

[boddhisattva]

My congrats to you too! 8)

[irfanullah]

Thanks for respect & highlight our names. Upvote & become to your followers.

[hamzayousaf]

Congrats

[boddhisattva]

You too! 8)

[boddhisattva]

Thanks for watching! 8)

[necrophagist]

Been too busy to do anything but curate lately..i cant wait to learn sql and play with the data myself. Thanks for the list

[boddhisattva]

Thanks! It's not so hard. Try it 8)

[malonmar]

Very happy for to be here. Thanks!

[boddhisattva]

It's your merit 8)

[meesterboom]

Wayhay! I love rewarding comments!!

[ilyastarar]

I can second that! Thank you!

Rewarding comments is one of my strong habits as well. My upvotes are not too strong though.

[meesterboom]

Still, it's the thought as well that counts!

[boddhisattva]

My congratulations :-)

[angrybird]

Very informative ! thanks for sharing

[boddhisattva]

Thanks for watching! :-)

[libertyteeth]

Neat, I'm #82! :) Thanks!

[taskmaster4450]

Congratulations.

[boddhisattva]

My congratulations! 8)

[jwolf]

I am glad I am there. I am trying to do my best curating manually.

Thanks for sharing! Steem On!

[boddhisattva]

And you have nice results with that. Congratulations! :-)
And steem on!

[taskmaster4450]

Maybe some of the curators on this list who read this post can help me out.

I have to vote at 100% hence my voting power gets sapped very quickly. What is the best approach to using the votes...is quantity or quality better? Do I run my voting power down hence not giving each person much or be prudent and give it only to prized posts?

Thank you for the post @boddhisatva.

It is very encouraging to see what the best on the site are doing.

[surpassinggoogle]

I think when you get to 500 sp, you will have a vote slider appearing when you want to vote to manage power. You can then decide voting percentage. Different curators have varying interests when it comes to curation. So look for quality, some look at things beyond quality, like intention, effort, etc

[taskmaster4450]

Thank you for that. I powered up yesterday by buying some more steem so I found the vote slider.

It is interesting to see the different ways people approach voting. Some vote almost everything while others hold their votes and make them valuable. I guess there is so much good content on here that it is hard to limit it.

Thank you for your reply.

[iyanpol12]

That's great! I will aim for that!

[boddhisattva]

It all depends on how much you want to vote. The more posts you want to support, the less voice you need to use

[rudel]

awesome effort keep up

[boddhisattva]

Thanks!

[rulesforrebels]

i made the list!!!

[boddhisattva]

Congrats! 8)

[disarrangedjane]

oh, WOW!!
Thanks for the stats! I'm mighty humbled! I still don't really understand all of how it works, but I do love reading great content, and offering my 2 cents. (actually...1 cent, at 100% voting. LOL.)
Thanks again!!

[boddhisattva]

But you will! Good luck in steemit! :-)

[bubke]

Ha, cool to find myself on this list, motivating :-). Hail to @arcange for steemitsql, hail to you for getting this beautiful information out

[boddhisattva]

Thank you! 8)

[lyndsaybowes]

Wow!! COOL!! Thanks for putting these stats together :) :) :) Great work!

[boddhisattva]

Thanks! 8)

[platinum.elite]

Curation is big on the to do list of many Steemians here.
u & r

[boddhisattva]

I agree with you. And I think that previously, when users were less, they were much more active

[dobartim]

Amazing information with all details. Thanks

[boddhisattva]

thank you too!

[goofyu]

No idea how I made the list :D #139

[boddhisattva]

You did it by upvoting other users comments 8))

[sift666]

Awesome! Thanks for the shoutout, I'm very proud to make the list alongside some real legends

[boddhisattva]

Thank you too and good luck 8)

[surpassinggoogle]

You know community and understand it. It is still quite rare to see this. This is the high road you took and it is loveable and admirable. Instead of focusing on people's wallets etc, to defined your own path and its a stand out. Overall, it is a stand out when you try to stir and beauty the community. I do comment voting for many reasons and i read the comments to decide weight and for exactly same reasons as you have picked. Steemit growth works inside out, strengthing the community that's existing and dispel every doubt about steemit and strengthen their conviction in the platform and the vibe will be passed on to the outside even when they try tell family and friends to join steemit. There other reasons for doing this too, another being, so that voting doesnt become a community thing and can reach everyone. etc.

Then i do posts as well. Where i do many comments as well!

https://steemit.com/steemit/@surpassinggoogle/let-s-build-a-shareable-steemit-post-that-answers-every-newbie-question-and-dispel-all-doubts-about-steemit-ask-me-anything

[boddhisattva]

I've been in Steemit for over a year now. But I'm not sure that I can say that I understand the community well.
What you do is great. Many do not have enough time and desire for this.
Including me. You understand, family and work.

I do this statistics for two reasons (not counting the desire to earn):

• I'm curious to understand how the community is currently working. who is its engine
• I want to show other users what is actually happening. because sometimes people see only the bad. and from this statistics one can see how many people are trying to help others

I hope that in the end this will help both authors and curators from this statistics.

[surpassinggoogle]

Awesomeness. Jehovah bless us in Jesus' name amen!

[boddhisattva]

Yeah! God bless you! Amen 8)))

[serkagan]

How many of you I read, so much and convinced of your philosophical approach to your actions on the Steemit, you aspire to instill a creative start to the participants and only then receive some benefit from this creativity and thank you for this :)

[sanj]

Thank you!

[boddhisattva]

Thank you too

[globocop]

Congrats @disarrangedjane! WOW! :)

[boddhisattva]

:-)

[globocop]

So pleased for Jane - she just doesn't know how she deserves the mentioning.... :)

[dreamzchm]

That's a cool list.

[boddhisattva]

Thanks!

[herm4n]

Thank you for the information of his

[boddhisattva]

Glad you like it 8)

[thatsweeneyguy]

I don't think bots should have been included in this list. Bots are not curators imho

[boddhisattva]

You are not first who tell it. I agree with you and soon I will decide how to separate them

[thatsweeneyguy]

You'd probably have to do it manually. Not sure how you're collecting the data though.

[boddhisattva]

I think do it manually is really hard. I'm using a mixed mode

[greatvideos]

Thanks for sharing
Good to know who to follow Too

[boddhisattva]

Thanks for watching 8)

[greatvideos]

You are welcome

[bob-elr]

Indeed they are heroes. I know few of them. But I must commend their good morning work for them to be recognized.

[boddhisattva]

Sure 8)

[samiwhyte]

Nice job
These curators are actually doing a great job
And dis is also encouragement to newbies

[boddhisattva]

Thanks! Yes they are really good guys

[allabout]

If you are serious about achieving your desired goals,
be willing to let go of the small pleasures found in the moment that may sabotage your chances of experiencing true pleasure when the sacrifice is paid.

[boddhisattva]

I think you telling right things 8)

[eastmael]

Thank you very much for this. I knew @surpassinggoogle was doing something special. And seeing his name on top of the list proves that. Thank you for the hard work @boddhisattva.

[boddhisattva]

Thank you too 8)

[bobiecayao]

its really showing that @surpassinggoogle is the most active comment curators in steemit. That is amazing..

[boddhisattva]

Sure looks like he is really the most active 8)

[jammey]

I have always wanted something good out of Steemit. The problem I have is that I am not a writer, I don't know how to write
But I wish to make a living our of Steemit so I have being g looking for a post on curator. Now, come to think of it, how can I be a curator and what's the benefits I can get from being a curator.

So please can anyone here help me I'm always grateful to @gigafart fie the little time he Upvoted my post. I did not know how or why he was doing it but what I notice is that, where I am today on Steemit is all thanks to him.

[boddhisattva]

Thank you too