Yes but they need to stop spamming bitcoin to try and achieve that as it put me off if they got spammed bcash network would be just as expensive and shit!
Please prove that there is "spam" and after you give an objective definition for "spam transactions".
There's nothing whatsoever suggesting that at any point with any level of adoption Bitcoin Cash (Bitcoin as per the whitepaper and Satoshi himself) would be having the same issues as Bitcoin Segwit is suffering due to its constrained blocksize and butchered incentives.
You've been duped by the side using sock puppets to call us the same. They censor and manipulate opinion constantly. Only recently did they lift the veil ever so slightly on r/Bitcoin and BitcoinTalk again, but by now they can not be trusted.
Nothing new. I honestly don't buy that the issues originate merely from "spam" by anone or any group. Even if there are small transactions, even if they are done intentionally and even if it should turn out that it was a coordinated attack even. It's not enough.
The problem is obviously because of infighting and governance as the scaling issue does need to be solved still but spam is compounding the problem by causing network congestion and even higher fees
Haha, not with all the lying and fud you guys spread. And roger ver as your spokesman? You are as desperate as they get. You should throw in Harvey Weinstein while you’re at it.
There is no official spokesman for Bitcoin Cash. Let Satoshis own definition and early explanations be the authority on what Bitcoin is. There is no other.
There are plenty of assholes supporting all the different suposed implementations of Bitcoin. However there is one camp using censorship, manipulation and sidechains as a means to promote going against the white paper and Satoshis original plans for scaling.
Doing this is incredibly harmful and makes it something entirely different than Bitcoin as per Satoshis definition. The current ridiculous fees and "store of value" arguments with no basis aside, the accessibility of the main chain is being limited and the security of the network as a whole is being compromised one step at a time.
Interesting to know, although the arguments presented are still the same.
Ignore all the FUD. Just don't ignore the facts.
Fact is,
Bitcoin Cash is Bitcoin per Satoshis definition and preplanned scaling.
Bitcoin Core team has censored, manipulated and stalled for years now. Trust will be harmed even if they shape up later.
The fees have reached insane levels and there is no knowing if ordinary transactions will ever be practical on the main chain again.
Still, also I want Bitcoin Legacy/Core to succeed and create something wonderful. It's the current as well as proposed product and the social behaviour of the main team and their fanbase which I oppose.
We just have to wait and see what comes out of it.
BCH is no joke and TPB will eventually eat crow. It is a very unprofessional and juvenile jester.
BCH have a great future I'm sure.
Yes but they need to stop spamming bitcoin to try and achieve that as it put me off if they got spammed bcash network would be just as expensive and shit!
Please prove that there is "spam" and after you give an objective definition for "spam transactions".
There's nothing whatsoever suggesting that at any point with any level of adoption Bitcoin Cash (Bitcoin as per the whitepaper and Satoshi himself) would be having the same issues as Bitcoin Segwit is suffering due to its constrained blocksize and butchered incentives.
You've been duped by the side using sock puppets to call us the same. They censor and manipulate opinion constantly. Only recently did they lift the veil ever so slightly on r/Bitcoin and BitcoinTalk again, but by now they can not be trusted.
Satoshi would have been ashamed.
https://bitcoinmagazine.com/articles/curious-case-bitcoins-moby-dick-spam-and-miners-confirmed-it/
https://bitcoin.stackexchange.com/questions/16942/is-it-possible-to-spam-the-bitcoin-network-with-dust
Nothing new. I honestly don't buy that the issues originate merely from "spam" by anone or any group. Even if there are small transactions, even if they are done intentionally and even if it should turn out that it was a coordinated attack even. It's not enough.
The rest remain the same.
The problem is obviously because of infighting and governance as the scaling issue does need to be solved still but spam is compounding the problem by causing network congestion and even higher fees
Haha, not with all the lying and fud you guys spread. And roger ver as your spokesman? You are as desperate as they get. You should throw in Harvey Weinstein while you’re at it.
There is no official spokesman for Bitcoin Cash. Let Satoshis own definition and early explanations be the authority on what Bitcoin is. There is no other.
bitcoin judas say what you want about him people like arseholes so he serves a purpose
There are plenty of assholes supporting all the different suposed implementations of Bitcoin. However there is one camp using censorship, manipulation and sidechains as a means to promote going against the white paper and Satoshis original plans for scaling.
Doing this is incredibly harmful and makes it something entirely different than Bitcoin as per Satoshis definition. The current ridiculous fees and "store of value" arguments with no basis aside, the accessibility of the main chain is being limited and the security of the network as a whole is being compromised one step at a time.
i support side chains as way to bring more features to bitcoin but sidechains as a way to scale that dumb
Yes, no problem with sidechains really if the main chain is not made less accessible (either by fee, lessened security or else).
I love the idea of rsk.co do you?
I'm not on any side as I'm holding both! I just don't like the tactics that is all which both parties are guilty of IMO!
I understand the technology and I'm not going to fall victim to FUD thanks I will make my own objective decision
Interesting to know, although the arguments presented are still the same.
Ignore all the FUD. Just don't ignore the facts.
Fact is,
Bitcoin Cash is Bitcoin per Satoshis definition and preplanned scaling.
Bitcoin Core team has censored, manipulated and stalled for years now. Trust will be harmed even if they shape up later.
The fees have reached insane levels and there is no knowing if ordinary transactions will ever be practical on the main chain again.
Still, also I want Bitcoin Legacy/Core to succeed and create something wonderful. It's the current as well as proposed product and the social behaviour of the main team and their fanbase which I oppose.
We just have to wait and see what comes out of it.
So what do you think about bitcoincash doing the EDA?