I agree its difficult to accept that the concept and implementation came from a single person, but the very fact that the creator is not publicly known suggests an individual (or at least a very small group of individuals). The more people in the know, the more likely it is one of them will talk (even is accidentally).
There are advantages for Govt in a system that tracks every single transaction in an open database, but I feel it would have been implemented differently if it came from government.
Looking forward to part 2 though!
Yeah it is a challenge get around it being a government created asset, even if done secretly. Makes little sense, but I'm still interested to see where this conspiracy theory is going :) Interesting story thus far for sure
Perhaps it will be :)