Actually the number of users have remained stable -no growth but no major loss either(if you count batching) bitcoin has 2 MB blocks but the capping of the blocksize was made to make the LN more imporant to use and to let more nodes run. With more nodes running the latency would be high but it would be much harder to take down bitcoin. Look I want to see big blocks but not too big. 4 MB +LN is the one for me :)
You are viewing a single comment's thread from:
Active addresses in ETH are soaring past Bitcoin.
Ok then? Nice to now. My point still stands
I am looking for growth in the protocol. Number of users, updates, use cases ECT. 99.99% of people have no interest in running a node unless they get paid to do it. Miners on the other hand have huge incentives to run full nodes and allow as many transactions as possible. I have no problem with 1 terra bite blocks to gain up to 7 million tps. Different coins for different folks. The Bitcoin today is not the one I signed up for in 2013. That's all I am saying.
I'll agree to disagree with you. Have a good day. 😀
That's fair. It's good for the have different coins with different ideas b/c it allows mass markets to decide who wins or loses and not a small group of extremist.