I've read it and it's quite funny to realize that someone more influential had the same idea almost two years ago. However, the way the proposition was to be made was pretty selfish in itself and revolved around the reputation and prestige of a forgettable yet influential academic who probably wanted to boost his fame. Having a community demand for a nomination would be much more effective in the field where it really matters: uniting the crypto community for a single cause everyone can agree on and creating some buzz around Bitcoin (which will benefit the entire market at large).
You are viewing a single comment's thread from: