i keep trying to say this to the scientific community
but all they keep telling me is, "its settled science."
"Where's your peer reviewed research?"
And i keep believing that this group, who call themselves scientists,
which i thought was a definition for people looking for how the universe works,
would look at facts, data and evidence and say, "i agree with you, these previous theories are incorrect."
But no, they brand me as a heretic!
Denounce me as some hell spawn
Please be more specific.
The Michelson-Morley experiment was a sham.
The measurement of gravity due to mass by an insane lord is still unverified.
The "laws" of energy only apply to a closed system, like a lab.
Thus, everything that follows, basically everything in the modern materialistic science books, is wrong.
The double slit experiment disproves the entire basis of modern materialistic science,
the scientific method.
What we think of as settled science has so many holes in it, that it isn't even a good colander.
So, specifically, EVERYTHING in modern materialistic science
Ok, ok.
While I seem to agree with you about the quantum eraser stuff, that doesn't mean everything we currently know goes straight out the window.
You need to identify mechanisms that are BETTER at PREDICTING FUTURE STATES than the current, established theories.
Sure, abstractly, "science is wrong (imperfect)", but that doesn't mean we should revert to pure intuition.
the electric universe model is far better than the gravity model.
And, although the planets still go around the sun, all the reasons why are different, making all the assumptions they teach you today worthless.
The animistic model of the universe is far better than the materialist model
at describing... everything.
And thus, it complete obsoletes so much scientific dogma.
Further, thinking that there is a real world out there makes you assume certain things, like what i see is what you see.
When we discard that piece, we have to take into account many other aspects, like the people's feelings about such.
As for instance, these people who found cold-fusion found something.
But then, MIT came out and said it was all bogus.
Thus, the people all believed that it didn't exist.
And now it doesn't.