even if that is so - is that a reason to get called out as a shit poster? have you read the comment in question?
You are viewing a single comment's thread from:
even if that is so - is that a reason to get called out as a shit poster? have you read the comment in question?
I read all of it. I was addressing a specific point of your post
yes, and I wholeheartedly admit that my engagement can be improved, of course. but it seems peculiar that you do not wish to comment about any other aspect of that comment, except my 'lack of significant engagement with people who comment on my posts'. but that is still ok, just have in mind that the things I am currently going through on the platform (calling out without any particular reason, nasty downvotes by whales) can happen to absolutely anyone on this platform. and in the long run - what are the positives from that?
I don't know why it would seem peculiar.
Shitposting has always been a difficult call to judge. I left out commenting on that part as one man's shitpost is another man's treasure.
When I saw your counter comment to the engagement I thought there is something that is easily verifiable so I had a look. And I commented on what I saw.
like I said - shitposting is such a difficult thing to explain. how can you possibly verify a shit post without being subjective af?
...one WOMAN's shitpost is another man's treasure --> FTFY 😅