I am sorry but in my opinion it looks like @themarkymark is right. I see from your public steemit wallet that you've been using @minnowbooster in the past and the working assumption is that you've also read the Terms of Service (https://www.minnowbooster.net/tos). Your posts in my view obviously violate the minnowbooster photography posting rules. Maybe you can contact @minnowbooster on discord but I don't honestly believe that would work in your case.
What really strikes me and what I would ban you for if I were a steemit promotion service is what appears to be your abuse of promotion bots. For example, sending 20 steem to @smartsteem to promote your "sexiest dove" post that is a single photo with no text.
Really? 20 steem for a single photo post with no text? The only possible way I would pay anything close to 20 steem under any circumstance relating to a photo is a licensing fee to use the photo. Maybe that photo belongs to @smartsteem and it is a license fee? There's no text to determine either way if it's your original work or not. How would I know?
I will not contact anyone because I'm not right. I will try to publish more elaborated content. That's it
My starting Groucho quote was a joke and I'm not saying that @themarkymark or @minnowbooster are wrong. BUT @buildawhale (that uses @themarkymark Global Blacklist API) doesn't refund invalids bids and steal it to found @badcontent. What does the green circular arrow with the $ symbol mean in the bot tracker?
I only post original content, but, and as an artist I'm having a bad time on steemit with the original work shit. I'm editing my post and adding:photo by @sanchezpuukko, that would help you? It's nonsense to me
"Photo by @sanchezpuukko" is three words. Since you seem to have no desire to read @minnowbooster's ToS here is the relevant part you're missing:
"...Length is subjective, but 150 words is a good safe guideline."
So three words is at least a start toward 150 words.
The policies of @themarkymark, @buildawhale, @minnowbooster, ect. are their own concerning refunds. If I were a promotion service I would ban you on grounds of promotion bot abuse and wouldn't refund you. Giving you a refund doesn't discourage you from such future activity and makes an example for others who want to make steemit a get rich quick scheme. After all, @buildawhale isn't refunding your bid and here you are in your last reply vowing to "...publish more elaborated content". You yourself seem to prove the @buildawhale policy works and helps to promote better content one way or another.
Sorry. It's late where I live. I tried helping you and after all that you're pulling a "no hablo inglés" when you didn't have reading problems with my first post and you seem to handle English well in your replies. There's very little text in any of your posts to show how well your English is so, fine, your English is poor for the sake of argument. You be you posting photography with three word content. At least now you're only sending @upmyvote one steem for promoting your "poor english" content rather than ten or twenty steem for photo only content.
I know you're helping, but don't understand all the hate speech. Te he dicho no hablo ingles cuando me has seguido contestando a tu bola. I think you don't understand me.
I know I'm right blacklisted by @minnowbooster but as steemit upvote bot user I deserve to know which of my bids will be a "donation". It's not clear. I do not think I'm a villain for wanting to know what bots want to do business with me. And you only can tag me as a bot bid abuser (i'm still learning) but seem s that you judge my posts. I quit the bid bots and problem solved.
I've always thought that when I got a bid, it was beneficial for me and the owner of the bot.
I am sorry but in my opinion it looks like @themarkymark is right. I see from your public steemit wallet that you've been using @minnowbooster in the past and the working assumption is that you've also read the Terms of Service (https://www.minnowbooster.net/tos). Your posts in my view obviously violate the minnowbooster photography posting rules. Maybe you can contact @minnowbooster on discord but I don't honestly believe that would work in your case.
What really strikes me and what I would ban you for if I were a steemit promotion service is what appears to be your abuse of promotion bots. For example, sending 20 steem to @smartsteem to promote your "sexiest dove" post that is a single photo with no text.
Really? 20 steem for a single photo post with no text? The only possible way I would pay anything close to 20 steem under any circumstance relating to a photo is a licensing fee to use the photo. Maybe that photo belongs to @smartsteem and it is a license fee? There's no text to determine either way if it's your original work or not. How would I know?
I will not contact anyone because I'm not right. I will try to publish more elaborated content. That's it
My starting Groucho quote was a joke and I'm not saying that @themarkymark or @minnowbooster are wrong. BUT @buildawhale (that uses @themarkymark Global Blacklist API) doesn't refund invalids bids and steal it to found @badcontent. What does the green circular arrow with the $ symbol mean in the bot tracker?
I only post original content, but, and as an artist I'm having a bad time on steemit with the original work shit. I'm editing my post and adding:photo by @sanchezpuukko, that would help you? It's nonsense to me
"Photo by @sanchezpuukko" is three words. Since you seem to have no desire to read @minnowbooster's ToS here is the relevant part you're missing:
"...Length is subjective, but 150 words is a good safe guideline."
So three words is at least a start toward 150 words.
The policies of @themarkymark, @buildawhale, @minnowbooster, ect. are their own concerning refunds. If I were a promotion service I would ban you on grounds of promotion bot abuse and wouldn't refund you. Giving you a refund doesn't discourage you from such future activity and makes an example for others who want to make steemit a get rich quick scheme. After all, @buildawhale isn't refunding your bid and here you are in your last reply vowing to "...publish more elaborated content". You yourself seem to prove the @buildawhale policy works and helps to promote better content one way or another.
I replied to that, no to minnowbooster's ToS. What are you saying? Vowing? My english is very poor and I'm afraid that my point is not clear.
I have not discussed the minnobooster blacklist, save the lessons
fantastic, @upmyvote too.
Sorry. It's late where I live. I tried helping you and after all that you're pulling a "no hablo inglés" when you didn't have reading problems with my first post and you seem to handle English well in your replies. There's very little text in any of your posts to show how well your English is so, fine, your English is poor for the sake of argument. You be you posting photography with three word content. At least now you're only sending @upmyvote one steem for promoting your "poor english" content rather than ten or twenty steem for photo only content.
I know you're helping, but don't understand all the hate speech. Te he dicho no hablo ingles cuando me has seguido contestando a tu bola. I think you don't understand me.
I know I'm right blacklisted by @minnowbooster but as steemit upvote bot user I deserve to know which of my bids will be a "donation". It's not clear. I do not think I'm a villain for wanting to know what bots want to do business with me. And you only can tag me as a bot bid abuser (i'm still learning) but seem s that you judge my posts. I quit the bid bots and problem solved.
I've always thought that when I got a bid, it was beneficial for me and the owner of the bot.
I bought my "poor english" content in fiverr years ago, note that the post that is well written is repeated.