All the characters in the stories are supposed to be human and human sometimes does partiality and sometimes let the emotions gets the best of them. :D@Yesaye, That is a good answer. But is arguable.
There is nothing wrong with Kekai wanting her son to be the king and there is nothing wrong with Lakshamn expressing his anger.
There are other version where the surpnakha attacked Sita and Lakshman retaliate in defense.
Now the story seems different. isn't It?
Agreed. I did realize that I'd have to overlook the fact that humans are partial if I had to write my opinion in this case. So what I did was, I selected the most partial among all.
I'd still say that Kekai did wrong, as, if she was only looking to make her son the king, then she could've done so in a lot more merciful manner. Why 14 years, when 14 days could've done it.
I will have to change my opinion on Lakshman if we consider the alternative version of his story so yep, the story becomes different in that case.
PS: My entry's up in MS-PACC! ;)