The post is now up to 30,000 views and still getting eyes on. @sneaks method of hiding important highly revealing material has definitely backfired on him.
I hope his flagging was a personal choice due to his worldview, and not serving a greater agenda. If this was due to agenda, we may have a big problem on our hands in reference to Steemit's objectivity. I pray I'm wrong and sneak just can't fathom that these events are staged. Anybody who denies false flags and staged events despite the massive amounts of evidence generally means well, wanting to protect other people from "fake news" because they cannot leave their own frame of reference.
I hope the post gathers 100 k more.
It is one of two major WTF moments lately in regards to core Steemit people acting in a most eyebrow-raising way. The other was of course the fallout between dan and ned.
Judging from his behavior I think its likely a personal choice. It is still highly unprofessional and disappointing the way he has behaved, just the same. Its also cause for concern when any higher up in an organization that is supposedly built upon the concept of promoting free speech chooses to act in such a manner. The hide feature, as used by heavy hitters, is essentially a form of soft censorship regardless of what @sneak tries to state otherwise. @valued-customer's posts in this thread sum it all up quite well.
I'd also like to thank @haejin. I was prepared to pay the price for my comments, as I am incapable of doing much to counter flags from @sneak and @bloom. @haejin stepped in and took care of that, and I appreciate it very much!
The post is now up to 30,000 views and still getting eyes on. @sneaks method of hiding important highly revealing material has definitely backfired on him.
The proximity to Ned and the Steemit devs is somewhat troubling.
Incidentally I stumbled upon this interview yesterday, good chance to feel the guy.
https://steemit.com/steemit/@ruwan/i-filmed-this-video-of-ned-pkattera-and-sneak-talking-about-the-smts-and-the-future-of-steemit
I hope his flagging was a personal choice due to his worldview, and not serving a greater agenda. If this was due to agenda, we may have a big problem on our hands in reference to Steemit's objectivity. I pray I'm wrong and sneak just can't fathom that these events are staged. Anybody who denies false flags and staged events despite the massive amounts of evidence generally means well, wanting to protect other people from "fake news" because they cannot leave their own frame of reference.
I hope the post gathers 100 k more.
It is one of two major WTF moments lately in regards to core Steemit people acting in a most eyebrow-raising way. The other was of course the fallout between dan and ned.
Judging from his behavior I think its likely a personal choice. It is still highly unprofessional and disappointing the way he has behaved, just the same. Its also cause for concern when any higher up in an organization that is supposedly built upon the concept of promoting free speech chooses to act in such a manner. The hide feature, as used by heavy hitters, is essentially a form of soft censorship regardless of what @sneak tries to state otherwise. @valued-customer's posts in this thread sum it all up quite well.
I'd also like to thank @haejin. I was prepared to pay the price for my comments, as I am incapable of doing much to counter flags from @sneak and @bloom. @haejin stepped in and took care of that, and I appreciate it very much!