What if we had a system where the users could downvote it for spam or poor content. If it gets enough downvotes it gets flagged. Then it can get reviewed, and if it the downvoting is deemed appropriate, then suspend that user?
You are viewing a single comment's thread from:
It’s not enough, the voting power of them can destroy 100 dolphins and 1000’s of minnows... no one wants to get a flag war ya know 😳😀... the whales must lead the pack.
Most true whales are not necessarily spending as much time on steem it as the ambitious upstart plankton & minnows. Would delegating to content curators be a best fit solution?
It may but they tend to abuse that power over time 😒😀
Is it possible Delegate to another person for 30 days at a time? Basically Vest in another account for 30 days or 90 days. Automatically power down to the Steem Power Provider. If that is possible I think that is a good fit for the problem. This type of steem power delegation and voting for witnesses every 90 days should be incentivized by the blockchain for maximum participation.
True. Don't want that, for sure.
Sounds like we need somebody to setup a site where you can submit post URLs anonymously, someone can review it, and if it is deemed to be a shitpost, then it gets passed to some whales for flagging.
We can form alliances just the way they have formed.