Isn't 325 AD when Christianity deviated from the truth? https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/First_Council_of_Nicaea
Muhammad lived in 610 AD
"Islam was historically called Muhammadanism in Anglophone societies. This term has fallen out of use and is sometimes said to be offensive because it suggests that a human being rather than God is central to Muslims' religion, parallel to Jesus Christ in Christianity. Some authors, however, continue to use the term Muhammadanism as a technical term for the religious system as opposed to the theological concept of Islam that exists within that system"
325 AD? So before 325 AD, Christians agreed with Muslims that Jesus didn't die on the cross?
Muslims didn't exist before 610 AD... so, No.
That's irrelevant. Muslims claim that Jesus was Muslim and so were the true followers of Jesus. So if you wanna defend the Islamic conspiracy theory, I suggest you provide some evidence that before 325 AD, followers of Jesus believed the same thing Muslims believe today.
Oh, I see. Good point. There is an interesting book I read, called "Ceasar's Messiah" by Joseph Atwill, that has some of the more detailed descriptions of the roots of Muhammad and Islam. He does draw some connections to the early coptic Christian community. Also, the book "Alphabet vs The Goddess", mentions something interesting, "No popular religious figure was ever literate. Jesus, Buddha, Muhammad, Socrates, never wrote anything down themselves."
So you wanna defend the Islamic conspiracy theory by referring to a pagan book? You call that book evidence before 325 AD that followers of Jesus believed the same thing Muslims believe today? REALLY??? The New Testament documents go all the way back to the first century which means mainstream Christians have always beleieved the same thing, more or less. Referring to a pagan book which draws some connections to early coptic Christian community isn't evidence. The Egyptian coptic Christian community goes all the way back to the first century and is still alive and well, and they too share the same gospel with mainstream Christianity. Not only does the Islamic conspiracy theory ignores the evidence, but also renders God and Jesus powerless... In other words, it would have been better if Jesus had never come ... IF the silly Islamic conspiracy theory was true... One must wonder why on earth God sent Jesus then... Even given Islam, Jesus was the most miraculous prophet of all which means his message must have been pretty important. Yet according to Muslims, his message is completely corrupted within the first century among mainstream Christians... and Allah has waited for 600 years to send someone to correct them... and even today after 1400+ years has failed to correct them... Give me a break!
I didn't realize I was defending islamic conspiracy theory. Even if you re-read my original post, I doubt that you will understand my intent. My point is that Jesus is make believe and Christianity isn't monotheistic, it was made into Christianity by Rome. Your original post was pretending to care about historical fact, but I guess you are just another bible humper that thinks that your God given right is think your religion is the only correct one.
I think anyone who's interested in historical facts can tell by now that you're just another Bible hater who pretends to be interested in historical facts... yet attempts to ignore historical facts by coming up with silly conspiracy theories that fly right into the face of historical facts...