You are viewing a single comment's thread from:

RE: Comment rewarding idea

in #comment2 months ago

I like the ideas. Something like @dustsweeper but for comments that get upvoted could also help. Basically, people with not enough hive power to upvote comments send funds to an service account like dustsweeper and when you upvote a comment it adds to the vote to reach the threshold taking that from your balance in a way that can't be exploited.

What used to help a lot for engagement was the Hive Engagement League from @abh12345

Also, the general trend just seems to be that most voting power is with some of the curation accounts who upvote posts that look like quality often from the same authors who don't really bother to grow their accounts but systematically cash out or delegate their stake to get more passive earnings.

Some kind of incentive switch needs to be made there one way or another. I'm thinking of writing a more detailed post about this issue.

It does feel though like the general interest around Hive is picking up again and more of the ones who are invested woke up looking for ways to fix key issues that have been here for long as the price of Hive has been pretty dead and they don't want to miss the possible bull run.

Sort:  

Something like @dustsweeper but for comments that get upvoted could also help. Basically, people with not enough hive power to upvote comments send funds to an service account like dustsweeper and when you upvote a comment it adds to the vote to reach the threshold taking that from your balance in a way that can't be exploited.

I believe @dustsweeper lets you choose whether to boost your comments only or to boost all comments that you have previously voted.

I didn't know that. The way I understand it, you send some funds to the dustsweeper account and whenever you get a post or comment that is below the threshold it bumps it up to a point where it's above it. I don't think it increases the upvotes you give to others who are below taking from your balance. I could be wrong but the only real info I can find is a post from 4 years ago.

Yeah I'm kind of operating on memory from 4 years ago. My understanding was that you can also use it to keep your upvotes on comments from turning to dust.

I just upvoted this comment, and peakd says 0.019. If @dustsweeper comes along and upvotes this comment before payout, then we will know. If it doesn't, it could be because the calculations are too close and it smudged above before it checked. I should have voted a little smaller for a better experiment.

I didn't follow up before now, but dustbunny did round this comment up to 0.02, so it does follow your own votes and keep them from dusting.