If sanctuary cities were a moral cause, so be it. Laws were made from morals, not the other way round.
As so with the the 2nd amendment.
If you don't fight for your moral causes, what's the point in doing anything?
Of course we all know sanctuary cities are a political game, not a moral cause.
Done or today in terms in destabilizing federal authority , and for demographic voter returns tomorrow.
This is about a breakdown in systems, and no particular causes.
(it wouldn't surprise me if the the left were trying to make this happen - the 2nd amendment sanctuary state- for example. Disruption for disruptions sake. Order from chaos and all that..)
The breakdown is the dangerous bit.
The new world order can't have an American constitution..
moral
this is what happens when you are writing war gaming rules, which is what I was doing yesterday - morale is a very commonly used word
at the moment, on the national scene, neither is held in high regard.
My rules on war gaming morale will be held in very- high regard, sir!
😂
That much is obvious. The belief that rights are given by God is not compatible with the idea that rights are given by the state.
@ironshield
if the state is the highest authority, they become god.
No matter the religion, or no religion - if it has higher authority to the state will be regarded as competition - and totalitarian mindsets do not like competition.
Rights of birth (or moment of conception, if we are being pedantic), need to be the charter.
Beyond religion or state or any authority. The act enshrines the right.