The thing I feel that is important to note is that a lot of the analysis for cryptocurrency is actually about understanding and researching not only the developers, the coin's purpose, and the company's vision, but also all of the news surrounding a coin as well. These include but are not limited to; exchange support, features, major updates for any applications the coins use, restriction/regulation, affiliations, media features, and the list goes on.
The truth is, that most people will not want to spend the amount of time looking into every aspect surrounding a coin to determine when it will go up or down, nonetheless check the legitimacy of a company. So what would the normal person do instead? Find someone that looks like they know what they're talking about. A bunch of people are getting played HARD.
By the time you find out if it's true or not the article would have already been paid out. This is a scam.
Seriously .... go back 6 months.... start the videos there... educate yourself.... free yourself... be happy.
But guessing you would never do that because you are too lazy and that's why you are jealous.
Edit: Selfcensor because of massstupidity :-)
Yes, unfortunately when you ignore fundamentals as Haejin preaches like the gospel you totally ignore the bitconnects of the world, people who bought into that based on his suggestions and also based on his assertions that fundamentals don’t mean anything to price have gotten blasted.
Bitconnect aint ever coming back because it’s confirmed ponzi scheme, website is offline and creators running with the money.
Imo, that’s poor advice and is doing harm. But faithers still gonna gonna cover their eyes and follow blindly. Hell, he’s not complaining. The more clickbaits the better.
Pump and Dump gang in the open. Sometimes smoke grenade with analysis of btc or eth but when it comes to low marketcapcoins... then he is not better then stupid McAfee who makes coins go up 100% in 1h but still trying with pic? Just be silent pumper. Easy to buy in befor publishing....
The last person that gets suspected is the person claiming to help everyone. If he was the real thing he would NEVER advise you what to buy. Real crypto enthusiasts say what they are buying and why in hopes that you will see the promise they also see in a coin. If you lose money, it would be their fault.
What I'm seeing here is someone pretending to know what is going on but making it sound too complex, to prevent people from doing their own research, so he can keep control.
But he's gained enough traction now that people will just blindly follow instructions. I'm not gonna lie @tuvokhl, I was following along for a while until I realized that this was actually BS. Then I started researching on my own. Anyone who is serious about cryptocurrency will look at multiple sources before making their own educated decision.
Thats why we do this work here @shello. He was advicing to buy a scam.
here is proof: https://steemit.com/bitcoin/@haejin/bitconnect-bcc-a-high-impact-trade-higher-risk-and-higher-roi-potential
Dont want to know how many lost because of him.
Jesus tap dancing christ. To say that events don't change the price, he is legitimately spreading FUD so people don't read the news and major developments. Nobody wants to learn themselves, and rather be spoonfed promises. Anyone who goes through enough forums has known for months that Bitconnect was a ponzi. Anything that guarantees a ridiculous ROI for minimal effort is fake.
Can't wait for McAfee to eat a dick btw.
@shello Please take a minute to peruse Haejin's portfolio from the past six months as affirmative evidence of his reputability. His technical analysis skills have been vindicated by a 95%+ success rate on cryptocurrency projections. Elliottician's are a rare breed of analysts whose methods may appear superstitious or even ludicrous at first blush, but results are results.
Skeptics may say, "well, given enough time, a monkey on a typewriter can eventually produce a paragraph from Shakespeare." First off, this sort of claim ignores the insuperable element of time. In technical analysis we are dealing with defined time and verifiable outcomes. Thus far, it is resoundingly so that Haejin's predictive trees have borne good fruit. You may well say in response, "everything in the market has increased over the past six months." Albeit there is merit to this statement, this does not vitiate the margins and magnitudes that Haejin has correctly called uo to three months in advance.
As for the claim that price leads market sentiment, this is by no means inconceivable. An example of this can be found in the recent regulatory threats by the Korean gov't. As price rises i.e. BTC marketcap breaking 300 billion dollars, governments start to take greater notice and become reactive. "The price" then drops in fear driven anticipation that the market will falter due to regulation. As "the price" drops, it reaches a threshold of resistance at which "the price" becomes appealing to investors on the other end. When "the price" arrives at a psychological level, people either buy or sell accordingly. Price fuels market behavior, that is why booms and bust occur in economic cycles. To analogize, events are triggered by price action in a similar way as to how technological innovation is triggered by the increase of human knowledge, as the collective pool of information grows, so do the innovations (ex. South Korea); vice-versa, as information declines, technology deteriorates (ex. North Korea).
booms and busts of economy have to do with intrestrates, fiatmoney and central banks. good damn learn more befor you write text phd like making me sleep...