This is an okay article, it has all the sources cited correctly and does add at least a tiny bit of original content with some brief summaries of the source material. That being said, as far as C urie consideration, this would fall way short of the exceptional bar. The majority of this article is quotes from the source articles and the author really adds very little original content. If you can say that a post is primarily just summarizing other previously published articles without adding the author's own perspective, thoughts, opinions, experience, etc., it is a sure sign that the post is not Curie-worthy.
You are viewing a single comment's thread from: