You are viewing a single comment's thread from:

RE: New Respect For Trump

in #debate8 years ago

And look, they had like three back and forth exchanges about thr email. Trump won't let things go, the moderators needed to move things forward... It's literally the point of moderators. The lack of that is why so many Internet debates go on long past any usefulness.

Plus, remember Trump had his Russian friends hack the government servers. Hillary's were apparently more secure.

Also as a techie you can't "acid wash" email.

Sort:  

She just walked around the subject like when she was on trial. I gess if you just ramble off nonsence and lies till time is out so the question is skiped is not the same as avoiding the question to you?

The moderators are bias, they are only there to help Clinton. if you want I can provide a link to my post today with a shit ton of links to a bunch of proof showing how they are bias.

Trumps Russian friends? LOL There is no proof that Russia had anything to do with it. in fact ggucifer 2.0 is the hacker that did it. you are jst parroting the same lies the main streem media says over and over.

It has been said in court she to a sledge hammer to the server to destroy the information. that isn't even the fact that she had a bunch of people with noclearance on clasafied material read all of the emails and erase them. oh and the emails are out there. that is why we keep getting more and more leaks on them.
You claim hillarys servers were secure but in the court hearings it has been stated by the fbi that her servers werte hacked a bunch of times and the hackers got the clasafied information. -smh-
Again you eed to stop going to Hillary supporting "fact checkers". maybe so a little fact checking on your own?
Fucking swear

here are some links about the moderators:
https://steemit.com/politics/@skeptic/bias-debate-and-no-one-cares

LOL... oh well, comment limit. Maybe the comment limit is there to help you "not have toanswer questions during a debate." :P

I keep answering. xD

She avoided the question? Trump spent the entire Supreme Court question to talk about Hillary's finances!

And the moderators wouldn't let her reply... But you're too biased to notice that right?

As for a sledgehammer to the servers... Yeah, that wouldn't work. The data could still be read, so that was very clearly a rumor made up by people who don't know computers.

lol, I noticed they wouldn't let her reply. another skipped question for her. you are proving my point.
You think they didn't let her reply to is as help to trump? I see it as help to Clinton to not have toanswer questions during a debate.
It is not a roumer it was talked about in the fbi court hearings. and I said it did not destroy the emails and that is why they keep getting leaked. maybe you should be telling her that doesn't get rid of the data not me.
I swear you don't look anything up for yourself online do you? you just parrot the talking points that have been repeted over and over it feels like.
The moderators were specially picked bias reporters. here are some links.
https://steemit.com/politics/@skeptic/bias-debate-and-no-one-cares
again I will say they are helping her dodge questions. it does not matter what I think though, the facts are out there is you actually want to check stuff your self instead of taking someone word for it.

Oh the finances she got from criminal actions?

"Acid Wash" refers to BleachBit which was the name of the software used.

http://www.factcheck.org/2016/09/trump-pence-acid-wash-facts/

Look, I'm a programmer... I'm basically taking exception to the lack of technology savvy he displayed by calling it acid washing as well as claiming it was expensive.

There are plenty of ways to scrub hard drives, acid... Well, honestly the right kind of acid would probably work but usually you run software to repeatedly overwrite the bits with garbage and then shred the drive for good measure.

Did Clinton mishandle email? Seems pretty likely. Did she do it in a way worse than Republicans? No. Is that worse than the Things Trump has done? Again, no.

"I'm basically taking exception to the lack of technology savvy he displayed"

Yes to those in the know it makes him appear like a luddite.

Unfortunately there are many that will be just as clueless as he is about it. I bet he even had it explained to him and is deliberately continuing this line of describing it.