Of course, @bloom would upvote your senseless comment which doesn't even discredit my position.. but hey... he's been spam downvoting my content so I'm not surprised he'll vote for someone who confronts me even if the "confrontation" is insignificant.
You are viewing a single comment's thread from:
I don't know who bloom is, but they seem pretty intelligent going by what they upvote. You're just a mindless conspiracy nutter who thinks they can buy tanks with bitcoin when the government blows up, which is just funny to laugh at.
Conspiracy nutter? How? I'm not the one trying to impeach Trump on hearsay and pushing up shotty witnesses who don't even want to testify. LMAO Why doesn't Joe Biden want to testify, jee being under oath is probably what he's concerned about.
Also, you can buy a tank with bitcoin, If you're actually american you would know you can buy tanks and fighter jets, and yes you CAN arm them with special licenses. This has long been the case before Bitcoin was even a thing, and if military arms dealers accept purchases in bitcoin then AWESOME... If not thats fine, I could just sell bitcoin for cash. So you don't really know much about America if you don't know what rights we have when it comes to armoured vehicles.
My god you're so fucking hilarious and the fact that you are actually explaining the process of BUYING FUCKING ARMED TANKS AND FIGHTER JETS like it's a normal and totally rational thing is mind blowing. Really, please keep posting, this is getting into lolcow territory.
Also it's pretty clear you didn't watch any of the hearings if you're calling it hearsay. Several witnesses were on the call that is in question and testified as such. Dumbass.
You're so ignorant, I bet you had no clue that at one point the company, Pepsi, was a military powerhouse for a short period of time with an entire navy fleet and it was completely legal!
I did know that, but thanks for posting a random off-topic thing to "own" me with. LMFAO.
Now I'll one-up you! I bet you didn't know that the man who falsely imprisoned former president Lula da Silva was both judge AND prosecutor during that case, and then was made justice minister by the man who stole the election as a result!
"own" you, I never said anything about owning you... NOTHING AT ALL... those are just your own delusions.
you... can't read. Holy shit, for real. You posted that with the effort to own me, you don't need to say "ALERT: I am owning you!" for it to be an own attempt.
Nice dodge, dumbfuck.
"My god you're so fucking hilarious and the fact that you are actually explaining the process of BUYING FUCKING ARMED TANKS AND FIGHTER JETS like it's a normal and totally rational thing is mind-blowing. Really, please keep posting, this is getting into lolcow territory."
You obviously don't know anything about our laws when it pertains to guns, explosive devices, and armoured vehicles. You leftists have no clue what you're talking about when it comes to owning weapons in the US. Also it is normal, I live in Florida there are events held here where privately owned fighter jets fly around.
Also, the F16, one of the best fighter jets in the world is available for sale in Florida. This is completely normal for us, and people in whatever state you live also probably have the right to own these weapons.
Statistically, there are roughly more than 1000 privately owned tanks in the US and some 800 privately owned Jets (including bombers and fighter jets). This also doesn't include the fact that you are free to even modify a Honda civic with bullet proof armour, bullet proof glass and run-flat tires, and on TOP OF THAT have it armed with a .50 Caliber on its sunroof and you can do that legally using the required papers and licenses, you can even attach explosive devices to the Honda Civic if you'd like but that comes with a fee for the weapon and each individual shell.
Also it's pretty clear you didn't watch any of the hearings if you're calling it hearsay. Several witnesses were on the call that is in question and testified as such. Dumbass.
I've been stuck on c-span for the entire thing, also President of Ukraine declared there was not a Quid Pro Quo... Democrats don't have anything except second-hand hearsay, and the one man that can give more legitimacy to the impeachment inquiry is Biden and he REFUSED to testify because he knows if he lies for his son under oath then that throws out his chances in 2020.
Knowing about something doesn't mean I think it's a good idea.
I know you can do this, but caring enough to write a detailed walkthrough is just cringe. You're a cringey moron.
Colonel vindman was on the call, therefore it cannot be second-hand. You're clearly lying and won't look up the details. Can't wait til you flip flop and then tell ME that he was on the call, though. Would be hilarious. Biden had nothing to do with the quid pro quo, by the way. That was all trump. Pretending I have to like biden or something is also bizarre, both him and his son are terrible people. Next.
Well I think its a great idea, why do you think our country has NEVER been directly invaded in the last 100 years, we've only had small skirmishes on our lands and seas by foreign troops (like Pearl Harbour attack), and we retaliated swiftly and strongly after the fact.
I know you can do this, but caring enough to write a detailed walkthrough is just cringe. You're a cringey moron.
Hey, I'm asserting some very clear points, that you have NO idea what you're talking about when it comes to weapons so don't even try to bring it up.
Colonel vindman was on the call, therefore it cannot be second-hand.
Vindman's testimony:
https://www.washingtonpost.com/context/full-transcript-of-testimony-of-lieutenant-colonel-alexander-s-vindman-white-house-ukraine-expert/6c7d991c-1916-47a2-a320-cfbbea54eb52/
Page 14:
Vindman - "I want the committee to know I am not the whistleblower who brought this issue to the CIA and the committee's attention. I do Not know who the whistleblower is, and I would not feel comfortable to speculate as to the identity of the Whistleblower."
He was listening into the call, and all he said was that he "THOUGHT" that what Trump said was wrong and that he was "concerned by the call", which led to him reporting it as it may affect US-Ukraine's partnership in the longrun, him reporting it was about protecting US interests in Ukraine. The interests that have been expanding before this impeachment ordeal ever took place. (PAGE 17+)
Enjoy this from Tim Pool!
I never made claims of weapon knowledge, I asked where you'd get them from when the government dissolves.
LMFAO TIM POOL HAHAHAHAHAHA YOU'VE COMPLETED THE CHECKLIST FOR BEING A DUMBASS!!!
Thank you for copy/pasting the vindman thing and telling me what I told you while pretending I didn't tell you first. You really are hilarious. This is so epic.
Oh no, not Tim Pool....that guy sits on his computer selecting cheap "culture war" stories that he knows will enrage his right-wing fanbase into donating to him. For claiming you're an intelligent journalist, surely you can see that he's a complete grifter.
How come he says he would never vote for Trump or the Republicans, yet only ever shares stories on his channels that praise Trump and dunk on "the left". Riddle me that!