weird take on this... all these people on this call have been to the yearly conferences and have had their faces seen plenty. What they're saying is what is important.
You are viewing a single comment's thread from:
weird take on this... all these people on this call have been to the yearly conferences and have had their faces seen plenty. What they're saying is what is important.
Well I'm speaking from the perspective of an outsider looking into the core of the Blockchain: the developers.
You're speaking from the perspective of someone that's keeping up with the activities of those players within the community. A likely already committed investor/user.
Your example actually emphasizes the need for such information to be better distributed outside of this bubble.
When Hive detached from steem it celebrated the COMMUNITY factor as the true value of this blockchain. I agree with that. So the opportunity to continue with that existed as a very powerful branding potential that could then continue to generate attention and users/investors. Yet some half a year on, the opposite has happened.
Also what happened to that Janine/Jenny? girl that took a frontline role on the Hive migration process? She had a proposal that was somewhat ill received but I can't find it now. I actually thought that her initiative would be good for this project.
A female as (Queen bee) the face of Hive ready to put in work on marketing and such.
This is my point, that early on this was looking like a rejuvenated Blockchain where a 'Monster Sun' had awakened the 'real world people' to realize themselves as the true value. Opportunities like that don't come around often and the buzz around this new thing called Hive essentially exploded. Capitalisation on that to then present 'all the people of Hive' had great potential. After all, speculation obviously attracts but it's really people that attract people.
@justine, she's still around. Her proposal got fully paid out and now has expired so it's no longer part of the active proposals.
Not sure I follow you on the female stuff, skills is what matter not the sex.
And yes it's the usual, hive has great devs but no good marketers or biz devs.
Yeah I don't mean it should be females for the sole purpose of female... but as a marketable trait. Seen as a beehive has a Queen in the middle. Also because crypto isn't too successful at attracting females. Though HIVE doesn't actually have that problem. The makeup, Venezuelan and chainart communities here are well stacked with females so that's a big positive to attract growth. The only negative is that I believe a robust chat that isn't discord is a must once a larger userbase is achieved.