You are viewing a single comment's thread from:

RE: to clear up some confusion

in #diaf7 years ago

Unsuprising that the very man who walked away from us in disgust because someone suggested that vaccinations may be linked to autism. This is classic projection as sneak is not able to accept the bigoted part of himself. According to the definition posted here, this applies to almost everyone I know. But the only person I can do anything about is myself. To notice when I feel like not tolerating someone else’s opinion and go inside and figure out what’s really going on. I can then have compassion for myself and then for others. Bigotry is just fear manifested. It’s scary having an open mind. So although I flagged this post for a bit of fun, I forgive the bigot within and forgive the bigot in you and others.

Sort:  

I excused myself politely because I had to go; this didn't stop you from harassing me the following day unbidden.

It is my sincere hope that all you pseudoscientific anti-vax nonsense peddlers lose or forget your passwords.

Instead of childish wishes of lost keys for someone with a different POV, why not respond to what I actually wrote?

I was not interested in wasting time speaking to you then; I was not interested in your drive-by harassment the next day, and I’m not interested in hearing from you now. I will flag all comments you make on my posts from here on out. If you want to continue, do it on your own blog.

I always find it interesting to see how the ego fights so hard to protect itself. I was not the only one there mate. And I wasn’t even the one that said I thought there may be a link between autism and vaccinations. You laughed in disgust and walked off. And if you think that asking you he next day about vaccination s is harassment then you have an extremely low pain threshold and I wouldn’t strongly advise you against having children or getting married.
With regards to calling anyone who disagrees with your POV pseudoscientific, how many books have you read that poses arguments from at least both sides of the argument?