I know who, but, engineers should not be a politician, IMHO.
Engineers are trained to be factual and precise. Engineers can not lie.
I know who, but, engineers should not be a politician, IMHO.
Engineers are trained to be factual and precise. Engineers can not lie.
I noticed that you didn't answer the question.
Is that a form of prevarication?
ah ha!
https://www.vocabulary.com/dictionary/prevarication
At face value, not so well.
He gave us high inflation as I started in my first job and home prices were flying.
I started working in 1976 and was not able to buy a house until 1979 and by that time, home prices in Houston went up a lot.
my answer skirted the question, but, it is to illustrate the point precisely.
yes.
The straight answer was - terrible! He gave us high inflation and high interest rates.
he was the worst president in american history...
until about a decade ago.
there's a difference between the world 'can' and 'should'.
I am presently engaged in a project which involves two structural (foundation) engineering companies.
one represents the seller.
one represents the buyer.
you reckon they are both saying the same thing?
Agreed.
I do not get your question:
engineering reports should be correct and same within engineering standards.
However, the representatives of each company will use the engineer's reports to their companies benefits where the economics, risk, and profitability comes into the picture.
So, saying the "same things"? - engineering reports (yes, within limits) or the business proposals (no)?
we'll see..the reports are due tomorrow.