I completely agree that Bush Senior, Bush Junior, Obama, Clinton, etc are all beholden to the same people, which are not "the people". Are some of those billionaires like Soros, that fund their campaigns with massive doantions? Yes, definitely
But that's not all the money those politicians got. They also got a lot of money from the military industrial complex: Giant corporations that directly gain from destabilizing for example oil competitor Venezuela (Exxon Mobil), or those giant Wall Street banks that want the banking system unregulated so they can make quick cash which eventually results in a crash and then they "need" to be bailed out without consequence for them or their managers (Goldman Sachs), or giant health insurance companies that don't want people to be allowed to import medicine from Canada (United Health Group), or of course the aforementioned weapons industry that wants wars to be started, so they can get more weapons deals (Lookheed Martin).
Now, I doubt that these companies all get into a smoke-filled room and the health insurance companies agree that there needs to be war and the war industry agrees that people shouldn't be able to import medicine from Canada. They don't have to: They can just both bribe politicians with their massive campaign contributions, and then those politicians either do all of their bidding or lose their money for their reelection campaign.
Do all those companies benefit when Americans are at each other's throats over immigratio instead of coming together to end the wars that virtually everyone wants to end? Yes, they do very much
So could it br that part of the reason the US didn't want to for example legalize drugs was because then the Mexican cartels would lose power and that would decrease the number of Mexican refugees coming to the US? I do believe so. Even if Soros gave some Southern Americans some money, that probably didn't play that much of a role, there's already millions of Southern Americans in the US for very different reasons.
I think you're very right in your broader point on the elites and their strategy on dividing the people. I just think you're focussing on, even if true, a very part of the equation, that makes some people connect you to conspiracy theorists
I've been in this arena long enough to be able to shake off labels like conspiracy theorist, anti semitic, and hate speech. The people who label me as such are usually complicit or ignorant. The goal of these labels is to shut down free speech and free thought. That being said, you may be on the right track with your comments. Thanks bro.
Right. I think it's basically a conspiracy without a conspiracy, if you will. Hundreds of billionaires and corporations bribing thousands of politicians across the country (also in state legislatures).
To be honest, I feel kind of uncomfortable when you portray migrants and refugees as "a tool of the elite", and suggest that they're themselves hostile to the US, because those are still real people, including women and children, with a real need of surviving.
If the elites somehow blew up a train station to have us fearmonger over Arab immigrants, then the problem wouldn't be the Arab immigrants but still only the elites and the things they want to distract us from. I think you could make your point better if you made that clearer, for example the meme in this comment would make people think your issue is with the immigrants and that Soros is bad for helping immigrants, not that the problem is billionaires wanting to distract us from for example the wars.