You are viewing a single comment's thread from:

RE: Bill to Reverse Net Neutrality Repeal Gets 30th Sponsor...But Will Still Fail

in #dtube7 years ago

This is a very important topic, that I don't think aaaaa lot of people, that essentially live on the internet even have a clue about. Thank you so much for posting about the topics you do. Great work gentleman. Here we go, being hindered from getting things done due to the good 'ole pass around. Cheers guys! Keep posting.

Sort:  

Folks without a clue are always the loudest.
Maybe you could explain how giving the US federal government the authority to allocate bandwidth as a penalty to what it also has the power to determine is not 'neutral' is a good thing?
Maybe one of you that know so much about the legislation without reading one word of it can share some of this knowledge you were born with.

Yeah... This is going to cause A LOT of stink if they don't just put it back, lol. LOOK, we'll pretend you never touched if you just put it back where you found it.

I do not think I get your point man.

As in, reinstate the Net Neutrality they allowed the FCC to appeal (or not reinstate themselves, I can't remember which at the moment).

So you never even read the bill, have no clue what is in it and still want to jump on that bandwagon to have the government regulate your internet eh?
Are you really thinking or are you just trying to be accepted by the ignorant mob?
Maybe it would help to know the vast majority does not support government regulation of the free market. Only jobless antifa kids and the diversity hires do. They are loud but they are few in number.

Well no I haven't had a few hours to read thru their excessively long bill. I never jump on bandwagons. Tend to be the last one to. I just asked a question to as which it meant to over turn it. I know they like to name bills obtusely or even opposite what they are for. So, I was under the impression that the FCC had rejected the free access of the internet, and that was Net Neutrality. So, the government overturning said overturn would be a plus. But, if I am misunderstanding any of this, I was asking. Thank you for the information. I'll be sure to ride my bandwagon to another source of information.

Ya watch out for that band wagon.
Of course it seems like Net Neutrality is all about internet freedom. That is why they pick words like neutrality that tug on your feels.
It is the same for the Affordable Health Care Act because no one could afford it.
All Net Neutral did was poorly attempt to dictate how ISPs allocate their bandwidth. The reasons why the law was useless are all first year economics. In short the ISP would lose billions and likely go out of business if they tried to bundle Netflicks, which was the main terror of the ignorant mob.
What law does make sense is already in place. It is not legal for media companies to claim territory in the US. That law just needs to be enforced.

As for the internet being free that is up to ICANN which is up for sale to the highest bidder thanks to Obummer.