As you've probably heard, my comments tend to come with extra CL, so hopefully, in your calculations, you're accounting for that. :)
I suppose, though, scammers aren't particularly concerned about the comment length or the content, so it probably makes no difference. Still I'm excited to be a benchmark of some kind.
Maybe you could call it the LynnGlenGillian Benchmark. Or the GillianGlenLynn benchmark. I don't know, something like that. Kind of get some rhyming and sort of alliteration going.
I never noticed before, we're pretty heavy on the G's and L's aren't we? 😂
hahaha... that's why I think giglly is perfect ;)
How about Giglly? 😂 😂 😂
That's actually very good. I move to use Giglly as the name for the Gillian, Glen, Lynn benchmark. There is a motion on the table to use Giglly as the name for the Gillian, Glen, Lynn benchmark to be used in conjunction with the dustsweeper protocol. Do I have a second?
I second it @glenalbrethsen! 😁
lol.... you crack me up! I'm all for it :)
I second it @glenalbrethsen! 😁
The motion has been seconded. All in favor? @davemccoy @lynncoyle1 @danielsaori
I vote yea :)
Actually, maybe that name isn't such a good idea after all, given what's going on with the rest of the comments here. :)
I've lost the plot in terms of the rest of the comments @glenalbrethsen. They're all over the shop! 😁
yes, I don't think there's a plot... anything goes :P
lol.... this is even funnier!
haha... that is very good... both work great actually :) And I think that if anyone pops up ahead of you three, they will get the extra pat down like that have at the airports... But maybe since @danielsaori is a computer programming genius, he can make it work like they do now with those air blowers to detect criminals there! (no patdowns needed) :P