A'ho!
I adore your brain and the heart that steers it!!
Also finding it pretty hilarious and ironic that there are now left and right anarchists. But I get it. I guess anything that is labeled can thus have a direction.
Love you Kenny, and appreciate your continuous output of the respect-love vibrations~~~
You are viewing a single comment's thread from:
I don't believe anarchy can have a right and a left as there are no rulers only human rights so I own my body and my land. I believe you have to have land ownership otherwise you can't stop people from taking the food you grew because it is not yours it would be natures.
Maybe it is nature's and we could just take only what we need. What if we weren't so afraid of scarcity that we felt the need to hoard?
you can't live like that we would have to allow people to steal and kill and that is wrong and immoral. So if you grew some food you get to keep the fruits of your labor nobody should be able to steal it from you.
I don't think that's necessarily true. What if there wasn't enough land for everyone to grow food? Who gets it then?
are you saying this land is already unowned? if so then first ones to use it and start homesteading would get it, just like in nature first come first serve. There is so much land in just The USA that everyone could be homesteading, the problem is government claim ownership of it all which is illegitimate. Now it may seem like its not "fair" that first to use it gets it but its what is moral, if he used that land first to grow food for himself then it would be wrong of you to chase him away and take it or just take some food from it.
That doesn't work for me in a world with an ever-increasing population and need to keep some areas without permanent human settlement. That doesn't really hold space for the next 7 generations.
The world can hold a lot of people.