Now Just Five Men Own Almost as Much Wealth as Half the World’s Population

in #economy7 years ago (edited)

(Common Dreams) Last year it was 8 men, then down to 6, and now almost 5.

While Americans fixate on Trump, the super-rich are absconding with our wealth, and the plague of inequality continues to grow. An analysis of 2016 data found that the poorest five deciles of the world population own about $410 billion in total wealth. As of 06/08/17, the world’s richest five men owned over $400 billion in wealth. Thus, on average, each man owns nearly as much as 750 million people.

Why Do We Let a Few People Shift Great Portions of the World’s Wealth to Themselves?

Most of the super-super-rich are Americans. We the American people created the Internet, developed and funded Artificial Intelligence, and built a massive transportation infrastructure, yet we let just a few individuals take almost all the credit, along with hundreds of billions of dollars.

Defenders of the out-of-control wealth gap insist that all is OK, because, after all, America is a ‘meritocracy’ in which the super-wealthy have ‘earned’ all they have. They heed the words of Warren Buffett: “The genius of the American economy, our emphasis on a meritocracy and a market system and a rule of law has enabled generation after generation to live better than their parents did.”

But it’s not a meritocracy. Children are no longer living better than their parents did. In the eight years since the recession the Wilshire Total Market valuation has more than TRIPLED, rising from a little over $8 trillion to nearly $25 trillion. The great majority of it has gone to the very richest Americans. In 2016 alone, the richest 1% effectively shifted nearly $4 trillion in wealth away from the rest of the nation to themselves, with nearly half of the wealth transfer ($1.94 trillion) coming from the nation’s poorest 90%—the middle and lower classes. That’s over $17,000 in housing and savings per lower-to-middle-class household lost to the super-rich.

A meritocracy? Bill Gates, Mark Zuckerberg, and Jeff Bezos have done little that wouldn’t have happened anyway. ALL modern U.S. technology started with—and to a great extent continues with—our tax dollars and our research institutes and our subsidies to corporations.

Why Do We Let Unqualified Rich People Tell Us How To Live? Especially Bill Gates!

In 1975, at the age of 20, Bill Gates founded Microsoft with high school buddy Paul Allen. At the time Gary Kildall’s CP/M operating system was the industry standard. Even Gates’ company used it. But Kildall was an innovator, not a businessman, and when IBM came calling for an OS for the new IBM PC, his delays drove the big mainframe company to Gates. Even though the newly established Microsoft company couldn’t fill IBM’s needs, Gates and Allen saw an opportunity, and so they hurriedly bought the rights to another local company’s OS — which was based on Kildall’s CP/M system. Kildall wanted to sue, but intellectual property law for software had not yet been established. Kildall was a maker who got taken.

So Bill Gates took from others to become the richest man in the world. And now, because of his great wealth and the meritocracy myth, MANY PEOPLE LOOK TO HIM FOR SOLUTIONS IN VITAL AREAS OF HUMAN NEED, such as education and global food production.

—Gates on Education: He has promoted galvanic skin response monitors to measure the biological reactions of students, and the videotaping of teachers to evaluate their performances. About schools he said, “The best results have come in cities where the mayor is in charge of the school system. So you have one executive, and the school board isn’t as powerful.”

—Gates on Africa: With investments in or deals with Monsanto, Cargill, and Merck, Gates has demonstrated his preference for corporate control over poor countries deemed unable to help themselves. But no problem—according to Gates, “By 2035, there will be almost no poor countries left in the world.”

Warren Buffett: Demanding To Be Taxed at a Higher Rate (As Long As His Own Company Doesn’t Have To Pay)

Warren Buffett has advocated for higher taxes on the rich and a reasonable estate tax. But his company Berkshire Hathaway has used “hypothetical amounts” to ‘pay’ its taxes while actually deferring $77 billion in real taxes.

Jeff Bezos: $50 Billion in Less Than Two Years, and Fighting Taxes All the Way

Since the end of 2015 Jeff Bezos has accumulated enough wealth to cover the entire $50 billion U.S. housing budget, which serves five million Americans. Bezos, who has profited greatly from the Internet and the infrastructure built up over many years by many people with many of our tax dollars, has used tax havens and high-priced lobbyists to avoid the taxes owed by his company.

Mark Zuckerberg (6th Richest in World, 4th Richest in America)

While Zuckerberg was developing his version of social networking at Harvard, Columbia University students Adam Goldberg and Wayne Ting built a system called Campus Network, which was much more sophisticated than the early versions of Facebook. But Zuckerberg had the Harvard name and better financial support. It was also alleged that Zuckerberg hacked into competitors’ computers to compromise user data.

Now with his billions he has created a ‘charitable’ foundation, which in reality is a tax-exempt limited liability company, leaving him free to make political donations or sell his holdings, all without paying taxes.

Everything has fallen into place for young Zuckerberg. Nothing left to do but run for president.

The False Promise of Philanthropy

Many super-rich individuals have pledged the majority of their fortunes to philanthropic causes. That’s very generous, if they keep their promises. But that’s not really the point.

American billionaires all made their money because of the research and innovation and infrastructure that make up the foundation of our modern technologies. They have taken credit, along with their massive fortunes, for successes that derive from society rather than from a few individuals. It should not be any one person’s decision about the proper use of that wealth. Instead a significant portion of annual national wealth gains should be promised to education, housing, health research, and infrastructure. That is what Americans and their parents and grandparents have earned after a half-century of hard work and productivity.

Do you like our independent news and content and want to support unbiased, global news? Then please follow us! Thank you.

This article is shared from our official site http://anonymous-news.com/now-just-five-men-own-almost-as-much-wealth-as-half-the-worlds-population/ and under creative commons licence and with attribution to https://www.commondreams.org/views/2017/06/12/now-just-five-men-own-almost-much-wealth-half-worlds-population

You can also donate to us, every donation, no matter how small, is kindly appreciated. Thank you very much.

Here are our wallet addresses you can donate to :

Bitcoin: 17keMxjCg47YwZtrXbcvgPfrotPwWB9GBT

Dogecoin: DUCxWVRpvRCVEJ5cMznfhTyY7h4bMDU9ET

Ethereum: 0x248f1f8bd04831f42b939050383312272ee7b586

Litecoin: LXRpRGyiTAHGfqkzfSENuwddNBTMCErgpB

DASH: XxQJWjNdPd2QTjZRnFJivUSDbgp4dTNXfg

Namecoin: NHRczqv5FRz2kexeFhqrGew552gTUmL4DD

Peercoin: PLjQ9v3yKENTbSbKU1CiG8fdpHpy9aaw7N

Vertcoin: VjU8Tec32GPSUW3BuWa7xyK4fyj3s2Fokv

The DAO: 0xa2d8e97653f1d25ec46cf9781f29716e4da01400

Monero:456EEsoT2gmVaG6j1syt6ZRcC4Ef8PfioMf5ywoKbSrLSiGcJHMc6PVNFhvx3iZPSoK9VxgGhuMXYg2kkHhLkgfu83GKsTg

Thank you.

Sort:  

We're incredibly lucky to be alive during the greatest transfer of wealth and power from centralized to decentralized systems in human history.

Well said! Thats something I tell myself everyday, that im so lucky to be alive at this point in time. Really makes me appreciate life. I dont take one day for granted. Upvoted and following!

Thank you! Couldn't agree more. Following and best of luck to you!

so true, the wealthy gets wealthier, and the poor gets poorer

I suspect a great deal of that is because the schools are not teaching us how to create wealth on our own, but instead how to depend upon existing systems. Even if we overcome those boundaries, the state may require licenses, regulations, inspectors, and insurance that pushes the costs and expertise above what many ordinary folks can enter into-let alone be able to afford to market their products or skills. So it just becomes easier to depend upon existing systems.
As far as the wealthy, they are not wealthy because they are like a charity else they would be broke. What they do is they invest in other companies expecting to make a profit. Assuming that the rate of return is constant (it rarely ever is) and compounding, it growth can easily be modeled through the ordinary geometric series.

Great comment! Upvoted and followed!!

I wonder how many jobs they create, and how much they pay out in taxes. Really it wasn't that difficult to create an amazon or a facebook, even I had wrote a social network to compete with myspace and was evolving it into a commerce hub to advance nerds rights...but lacked the funds to really get it going. Was about to a few years ago once I became an actuary or could borrow more in becoming a graduate student-but instead I became a political prisoner right before I was to finish my second undergraduate degree and the county nearly starved me to death.
Facebook, microsoft, alphabet, amazon, et all al do things with mutual assent-and when the environment isn't destroyed that is a net positive on the world. These companies don't hoard cash, they invest it into other industries to create new jobs, new wealth, and cleaner technologies. It is government that needs to be starved to limit its abuse of power.