We are acting against CPS because they take children away but this is a case where CPS didn't intervene, this is the child-protection other side we should not ignore, CPS has a role to fulfill and we should all realise how difficult that role is.
You are viewing a single comment's thread from:
just to be sure you understand the whole story.. CPS did remove the child and it was the adoptive parents who killed the child., so yes they should have intervened when there were issues found with the adoptive parents...
What!?? Oh no, i didn't get that, i saw adoptive but didn't think it was an adoption through CPS, changes a lot, will reread the story Alex.
...Reread the story... (post edit)
Not much info how she got in Foster care...Don't know if Foster adoption automatically implies CPS... Whatever, what i want to say is still same. We don't want CPS to take action. We want CPS to take action. What do we want now? And what are we dealing with? Are we dealing with a few rotten apples or are we dealing with some bigger dark organisation behind all this? The CPS employee is thrown out, it might have been 1 rotten apple or it might have been a cover up, the latter is what is often stressed here in familyprotection, i like to leave both sides open.
These are good questions.. i think there is rampant incompetence happening on all levels, which is anyhow normal in any state run system. I think this is more than a few rotten apples, and shudder to think how deep this rabbit hole goes..
She got into care via CPS, which mean screening was NOT good. Then she wasnt picked up as being under threat despite several serious issues.. Houston, we have a problem!
One of my friends had this kind of CPS failure happen to her too.
She ran away a few times from home, begging the CPS for help, but was always returned back home,
because her psychopath parents managed to keep up the nice, respectable, well-to-do family facade in front of case workers and police and nobody believed the poor child.
I could write quite a story about her, but it sort of feels like exploiting her and it´s the saddest story I could tell.
If you learn about the things some parents do to their kids, suddenly CPS doesn´t sound so bad anymore, because whatever they do, at least they are not the own parents.
Nothing comes close to the damage parents can do, because they can install the notion of
"Even my own parents did not love me, I´m bad, I´m unworthy etc."Exactly @bubke.
Yes @likedeeler, so many stories can be told that illustrate there is a need for something like CPS, i would almost start a @childprotection account to show the necessity of child-protection. Might put a @parentprotection out for those poor old (grand)parents that are knidknapped from their houses and put in welfare elderly houses (don't know the proper English word for this) and let's not forget about our @VIPprotection, i even don't get upvotes on my comments from my fellow VIP anymore :-)
Eine Runde Mitleid! 😘
One round of sympathy!
I don´t know if you noticed, I´m not a VIP anymore, I´ve been promoted to Conductor, that means that according to ecotrain rules, which sadly nobody cares about anyway, you have to upvote all of my posts with 100%. 😎
And I have no more upvotes for comments left, because we now have so many wonderful passengers I spend all my VP on.
Interesting :-)
I never heard of that rule but it wouldn't make a difference as i mostly don't care about rules :-) (In NSFW terms, i shit and vomit on them).
I do admit we have amazing passengers though, worthy votes. I am so happy to make 70% votes now because i have 4 extra votes to give every day. There is also a lot of beauty when you look out of the train windows you know, off course you know...
A man without a ticket
This rule is very clearly stated in Alex´ pdf about the train.
Didn´t you read that one in the beginning to understand what you sign up for?
But since I am the only law-abiding citizen on that train, nobody else cares. 😪
Anarchy is absence of rulers, not of rules. 😘
That pdf is like an ico whitepaper, from dyno times in crypto timescale. The current voting regulation is NOBODY HAS TO VOTE ANYBODY afaik.
Shall we continue this conversation in the private hallways of Slack? :-)
"Have I not always tried to be not to harsh in the interpration of the common law that binds us?
And have we not, as a result of this, lived in a state of relative peace and harmony?
And today´s lawlessness is how you thank me." 💔