You're right. I didn't read the article at all, and merely linked it to show that my contention that the UN is advocating reparations from white Americans to the descendents of slaves in America - as long as those slaves weren't white - was easily shown via a simple search.
You said you had no evidence of such claims.
I vehemently disagree that reparations are appropriate, so don't bother reading such drivel.
That doesn't mean it doesn't exist, which was your implication.
All I did was search for 'UN slave reparations America' and paste the first link.
There were many, many more, and I have seen other quotes from the UN that does, in fact, advocate such reparations.
You are welcome to read on down the list.
I have better and productive things to do.
I have read it and they do not show what you claim they do. I find it funny that you admit you didnt read it. Are you aware that the media will hype up a headline and have different content?
You are changing the subject.
You said you could find no evidence of the claim.
I didn't say the claim was contained in the link I shared. I said it was evidence that was trivial to find.
I find your arguments are perfectly following the known methods shills use.
I believe you are a shill, paid to counter popular investigation into the industry that pays you to disseminate propaganda. If you're not actually a paid shill, you're a vile, manipulative person.
I, therefore won't feed the troll any further.
There is no evidence that this happened; you are giving me a link with a title that suggests it. sure there is evidence that it is claimed, whoopty doo, i can claim whatever i like.
The only thing you are feeding is your own bad conscience.