The idea that the Earth travels around the Sun doesn't mean we are worshipping a God (see note 1). The Greeks has/had a mythology where all of the planets were personalized including the Sun.
Regarding the question of what is the relational basis that gives us the tilt. As the earth spins, it creates an axis. This axis is like a string and forms a line. As the Earth travels around the Sun, this forms the plane. Consider this quote,
"At an obliquity of zero, the two axes point in the same direction; i.e., the rotational axis is perpendicular to the orbital plane. Earth's obliquity oscillates between 22.1 and 24.5 degrees"
Source see Note 2
Because of the variance, there is no set degree. Those who say 90 minus 23.4 is 66.6 degrees are stretching their imagination to fit their ideas. Equivalent to seeing bunnies or other shapes in the clouds.
This is geometry, not a secret cult of deception. Our cosmology has been proven time and time again with probes and with the success of putting man on the moon.
Peace
Note 1
religion
noun re·li·gion \ ri-ˈli-jən
Definition of religion
1 a : the state of a religious a nun in her 20th year of religion
b (1) : the service and worship of God or the supernatural (2) : commitment or devotion to religious faith or observance
2 : a personal set or institutionalized system of religious attitudes, beliefs, and practices
Note 2
https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Axial_tilt
============
Looking at word heliocentric
helio-
word-forming element meaning "sun," from Greek helios "sun" (from PIE root *sawel- "the sun").
-centric
word-forming element meaning "having a center (of a certain kind); centered on," from Latinized form of Greek kentrikos "pertaining to a center," from kentron (see center (n.)).
Source for word entymology;
http://www.etymonline.com
if you read the first bit of the post , someone accused ME of using cult-tactics in my blog posts, i am simply showing them , their idelogy is closer to a cult, so i used those references to support my claim that heliocentrism is sun worship in origin , that is undeniable. everyone who BELIEVES the heliocentric model cannot defend it , nor have any tangible proof ,we simply have to believe who ever is dispensing the information.
You say "nor have any tangible proof"
Proof of what? Heliocentric cosmology?
What does it mean to you to "worship"?
I ask because I'm wondering if someone can study the sun moon and other planets without having "cult" beliefs.
it seems everyone missing the objective and draws their own conclusions , as i stated , a group of globe earthers are suggesting im using cult like tactics , yet they dont seem to understand the origins of their own field of study, haha all because i told them their debunking theories does not prove the earth to be a ball nor flat.
They have no prove of the earth's shape , only cgi and mathematical equations.
Anyone can have a field of study, nothing is wrong with that. Im not against anyones way of life , you want to worship a glass of milk its all good fam , just dont tell me im stupid and a cult member if i dont agree with your idelogies. Thats my message to them , let people enjoy things like how they enjoy living on a ball.
pseudoscience
ˈsjuːdəʊˌsʌɪəns/Submit
noun
a collection of beliefs or practices mistakenly regarded as being based on scientific method.
"the new pseudoscience of ‘counselling’"
What's hilarious is you are literally using cult tactics when you are trying to associate the globe to a cult simply because some of the celestial bodies are named after gods. By your ridiculous cult logic, anyone who uses the days of the week or drives a Mercury vehicle are members of a cult!
Oh the hilarity that you can't even see that!
And the hilarity that you ignore all the evidence of a globe I've provided and just use the cult tactic of meme dropping little psychological sayings instead of providing evidence of the flat earth!
So, when will you show us how the eclipse on January 31st and all the rest to come for the next like 50 years, are predicted on a flat earth? These events ARE predicted! You must think NASA hires psychics or wizards to predict eclipses!
No, we use the globe model to predict eclipses.. and meteor showers.. and moon phases... and comet sightings... and venus sightings and transits... and daylight hours, etc. . Always have. Always will.
Now, lets see how the flat earth predicts all of those things at once. If you can't, yet these things ARE predicted by the globe model and have been predicted for decades and sometimes even centuries in advance, why do you think you have a viable hypothesis?
Sorry, I was wrong, solar eclipses are predicted out by NASA for the next 1000 years using the globe. Think of NASA on the 31st of the month... because they predicted that lunar eclipse you'll see if you are in the right region.
https://www.scientificamerican.com/article/solar-eclipse-charted-for-the-next-1-000-years
@haveyouvisited The Mayans and Egyptians had predicted all of these phenomena that you discuss, without the use of the globe model. And you seem quite obtuse to the occult symbolism that surrounds our modern society, one small example: the Washington monument is a obelisk, related to Osiris, and you can tie this in to the American Freemasonic influence on American culture. And yes, you are correct that the car companies Saturn - and Mercury and the days of the week draw their influence from occult origins, as well as many many other aspects of daily modern life. To anyone with a cursory understanding of these subjects the influence becomes obvious, the largest idol in the world is The Statue of Liberty, who is the Goddess Semiramis, the Queen of Babylon in her current form, holding the eternal flame with thirteen spikes on her head.
It's good to actually research topics before you attempt to mock people in debate, especially on their own blog.
So, first of all, you missed the entire point that the symbolism has exactly zero to do with the shape of the earth.
Secondly, I still don't see you showing me this model they used. You say that the Mayans and the Egyptians predicted all this, yet flat earth still has no model and not even an explanation for these events, let alone a model.
So, it's YOUR contention that they DID predict these events, so lets see the model they used. You do understand that for a hypothesis on the shape of the earth to be viable, it needs a testable model. Then, to be elevated to a theory, that model needs to be testable to comport with observable reality.
Please, no deflection or evasion. Just prove your claim. You say they DID predict them, so show us how they did that on the MODEL of the flat earth.
I suspect I will just get evasion, but all you need to do is to prove your claim. I promise. Show me your model that explains and predicts all of the dozens of observations we see in reality everyday, including this January 31st full moon, lunar eclipse and I will bow to your superior model and become a flat earther.
Will you do the same and become a globe earther if you cannot show this model that predicts these things, but the globe model does show this and I can prove it does?