Sure the math doesn't add up.
Some posts that get more votes than views.
Got 1440 followers? That leaves you with 1 minute a day to read/comment a post (24hours = 1440 minutes) and that doesn't leave time to eat sleep or take a shit (unless you post it).
You are viewing a single comment's thread from:
Views only count Steemit views, not chainbb, esteem, or any others, so it is not a good metric.
It's true, not everyone is cut out to make daily money here, imo.
I just like a more level playing field.
One where I only have to compete with folks with 50mv and not 1500+.
The experiment before the hard fork was working, minnows mattered in the n2 math.
With the n2 more votes means something, with linear it is strictly how much stake you have.
If you voted a post with a lot of rewards already, your vote counted for more.
Now it doesn't matter how popular the content, your vote is the same.
I hate to disagree with you, but IMO, I would make Steem a proof-of-stake coin. Distribute the new coins according to one's Steeem Power. If someone wants to reward a post it should be from one's own pocket. It would eliminate a lot of shitposts and self-voting would be irrelavent.
Yeah, that is a failed model.
Plenty of tipping platforms.
You gonna go to my patreon and sign up to support me?
Don't bother, I don't have a bank to send it to.
However, steem is doing a good job.
It can only be improved by more sharing from the top.
It's early, as the platform matures the distribution will improve.
This link shows a breakdown of the percentages that went to each class of user based on sp. https://steemit.com/steemit/@bitgeek/payout-stats-report-for-8th-january-2018--part-i
Check this one out:
https://steemit.com/ita/@serapeion/il-mio-pensiero-sul-testamento-biologico
174 votes, 11 views, just signed up.
It's all a mafia around here,