At the risk of being flagged, I'm going to make a couple of points, one of which I mentioned to you privately a few months ago.
For transparency, the TOS would do well to be linked on the @buildawhale profile page. It seems the only way of reaching these guidelines easily is via a 3rd party website.
As things have progressed in the past 11 months (TOS post date) with regards to blacklists, I think the TOS need updating to include information stating that if an account is blacklisted by any of the blacklists @buildawhale uses, a bid will not be returned.
Cheers.
No risk, I am not petty and immature like @fulltimegeek.
As for linking it in the profile, not a bad idea and I will do that later today.
Actually not true. I block on multiple lists but I have refunded multiple times when I didn’t agree. For example MinnowBooster blacklisted someone as they don’t accept religious posts.
Cool. I did head to the discord that is currently linked on @buildawhale's profile to see if I could spot the TOS there. I couldn't see it (but it could be there) and a locked channel with the rules could also work I guess.
My mistake. So perhaps my comment should end with '... I think the TOS need updating to include information stating that if an account is blacklisted by any of the blacklists @buildawhale uses, a bid may not be returned.'
What's the solution to your disagreements with each other?
@fulltimegeek will continue to flag my comments hidden, I will continue to prevent spammers from abusing bid bots. Third parties we both support will suffer the most because I got to spend all my voting power to counter a select few comments to keep them visible (which is still impossible due to the fact he has 90+ bots and I'm not dedicating 350K SP to upvote my own comments), and he can't support his zealots.
Everyone else will keep their head in the sand.
It's a shame Steem lends itself to infighting like this, I hope you two work our your differences somehow. ✌️