fulltimegeek tips over Grandma's crossing the street and steals candy from babies?

in #fulltimegeek6 years ago (edited)

image.png

After threatening me because he wasn't allowed to upvote this post using @buildawhale, @fulltimegeek has resorted to flagging every comment I make to zero and everything I do for the predictable future. I had to turn Ginabot off because as of right now I have received 506 508 511 flags from his bot army as of the time I finished this short post.

Post @fulltimegeek spend 387 Steem promoting

image.png

@fulltimegeek's bot army at work

By all means, flag me for the rest of the time you are here. But that's not enough for @fulltimegeek, he decided he will start flagging curation projects like @themadcurator to "send a message" he is in charge.

Apparently, because I delegate to one of the best projects right now on Steem, it's a good reason for him to flag it with his 90+ bots.

The bullying continues

He also unvoted anyone who witness votes me, I also here he is private messaging them threatening to remove their votes.

Sort:  

Marky I don't like what he did and I tell this while I'm supporting with my witness votes to both of you, I mean that his post is reasonably blacklisted but anyways I think that the refund that he asked for was also reasonable. Then if you want to flag to zero his post it's your
respectable decision but I don't agree with take those STEEM and don't provide the service.

I'm supporting with my witness votes to both of you

FYI Fulltimegeek hasn't been a witness for 2 months now ..

It's very clear in the Terms of Service we do not refund people who were blacklisted.

@buildawhale isn't the only one with this policy.

Surely posting 16,000 times a day and being flagged and blacklisted by Steem Cleaners is enough to qualify as spamming.

Because of his fragile mind and delicate constitution, I would have worked with him, I know from experience he is a bully, but I wasn't given the chance as, by the time I got back in coverage, he was threating to flag me for life.

Ok didn't know that clause :/. Anyways is sad to see these things.

At the risk of being flagged, I'm going to make a couple of points, one of which I mentioned to you privately a few months ago.

For transparency, the TOS would do well to be linked on the @buildawhale profile page. It seems the only way of reaching these guidelines easily is via a 3rd party website.

As things have progressed in the past 11 months (TOS post date) with regards to blacklists, I think the TOS need updating to include information stating that if an account is blacklisted by any of the blacklists @buildawhale uses, a bid will not be returned.

Cheers.

At the risk of being flagged

No risk, I am not petty and immature like @fulltimegeek.

As for linking it in the profile, not a bad idea and I will do that later today.

As things have progressed in the past 11 months (TOS post date) with regards to blacklists, I think the TOS need updating to include information stating that if an account is blacklisted by any of the blacklists @buildawhale uses, a bid will not be returned.

Actually not true. I block on multiple lists but I have refunded multiple times when I didn’t agree. For example MinnowBooster blacklisted someone as they don’t accept religious posts.

As for linking it in the profile, not a bad idea and I will do that later today.

Cool. I did head to the discord that is currently linked on @buildawhale's profile to see if I could spot the TOS there. I couldn't see it (but it could be there) and a locked channel with the rules could also work I guess.

Actually not true. I block on multiple lists but I have refunded multiple times when I didn’t agree.

My mistake. So perhaps my comment should end with '... I think the TOS need updating to include information stating that if an account is blacklisted by any of the blacklists @buildawhale uses, a bid may not be returned.'

What's the solution to your disagreements with each other?

@fulltimegeek will continue to flag my comments hidden, I will continue to prevent spammers from abusing bid bots. Third parties we both support will suffer the most because I got to spend all my voting power to counter a select few comments to keep them visible (which is still impossible due to the fact he has 90+ bots and I'm not dedicating 350K SP to upvote my own comments), and he can't support his zealots.

Everyone else will keep their head in the sand.

It's a shame Steem lends itself to infighting like this, I hope you two work our your differences somehow. ✌️

This makes me nauseous. 🤢🤮🤢 Why do I feel like we’re in fucking high school?!?

It looks like foolish game of schoolkid who wants to prove something to somebody and I think it just a wasting time from his side. Nobody will win in this situation.

Posted using Partiko Android

You're such a delicate Flower.
BSbiggahDicks10 2019-02-18 12-57-44.png

Source material: @berniesanders

Meme contest? Nah, it's too easy...

The Ultimate Dickhead

@themarkymark unfortunately your behavior toward community is not good i tried to contact you to remove my account from blacklist several time but you do not even reply .

Hi @themarkymark!

Your post was upvoted by @steem-ua, new Steem dApp, using UserAuthority for algorithmic post curation!
Your UA account score is currently 8.357 which ranks you at #12 across all Steem accounts.
Your rank has not changed in the last three days.

In our last Algorithmic Curation Round, consisting of 187 contributions, your post is ranked at #2. Congratulations!

Evaluation of your UA score:
  • Your follower network is great!
  • The readers appreciate your great work!
  • Great user engagement! You rock!

Feel free to join our @steem-ua Discord server

Make love, not war. 😂

eqIjEXJ.gif

Lol

Posted using Partiko Android

Don't approve of this type of behaviour. Called over by @berniesanders. Hope I have not, in haste, made an error of judgement

Posted using Partiko Android

Just wondering out loud

Could the root of the problem possibly be having a high level witness who is also a vote bot merchant?

As you know @themarkymark, this has long been a contention of mine which has been overlooked due to the work you have done for the blockchain; as well as your practical skills.

However, as it is now bringing such drama forward to the community it seems it is justified to withdraw my support for you as witness and stop following this greed and childishness on my feed and to, instead, focus on a witness that will bring only benifit to the blockchain with their efforts instead of promoting such a wedge issue as voting bots.

P.S. My delegation has also been withdrawn from @friendsofgondor as well.

Apologies in advance for the spam. This is an automated comment to reduce the voting power of @fulltimegeek, a flat earth retard who is flagging reputable users like @themadcurator, @themarkymark and myself because he's a whiny little bitch who is throwing a hissy fit.

Please support these users and follow @themadcurator and @themarkymark.

Thank you for your attention.

These things should be brought to the public, @FulltimeGeek is a bully who hides behinds the zealots he creates via bribes (paying their bills & free delegation and so on to spread his agenda). He is the one using all his voting power across over 100 accounts to flag and going around threatening other witnesses to remove their vote.

I am just providing transparency, which is something I am known a lot for.

You may well be making valid points, @themarkymark and respect that you.stand up for your services you provide; yet the route to this particular flag war grew directly from a voting bot run by you, which embroiled you in behavior not becoming of a top witness, in my opinion.

This flag war (wait is it a flag war if I’m not flagging him, or curation projects he is part of, or third parties associated with? Probably not as that’s just him), started because I had the decency to not allow a user posting 16,000+ times a day to buy votes from my bot, something almost all bot owners would be happy to do. It also is a result of him trying to buy 400 steem worth of bid bot votes for a post that only contains a link to a third party site.

But hey, Ill be the bad guy here if it makes you feel any better. I’ll even watch as he destroys one of the best projects on steem (@themadcurator) because he is acting like a baby and flagging the shit out of it because I delegate to it selflessly. I’ll even be the bad guy while he goes around threatening witnesses and users to invite me.

It’s what good guys do. We take shit for what we believe in.

Either way, I completely respect your decision, your vote is your vote and use it what you believe it. I would expect nothing less from anyone.

Can we agree that you would not have been involved in this drama but for your vote bot business?

I wouldn't be involved if I wasn't born either. Probably my dad's fault this all happened, luckily he left before I was born.

Sorry to hear about your Dad this way... yet point taken. Let's agree to disagree then.

flagged for spam @steemflagrewards

Denied. This post does not fit our criteria of spam.

Please avoid mentioning us about other people's drama.