With 111,304,097 of 760,444,832 (14.637%) of total vote weight participating, the outcome was to NOT enforce SSL encryption as a mandatory whitelist requirement.
I think this poll should only had been for miners. Investors are not communicating with these sites nor are they sending anything that can be compromised or are affected of projects not being whitelisted because of the lack of SSL.
However, the consensus of the miners are still a No even if you dismiss the Investors shares.
It is true however that many investors that took part in this poll has a larger share per user than the miners. Don't forget about the current polls regarding voting balance. But I still think this needs to be looked at on a deeper level in the future.
I think so to, this would only those who run boinc and not those who are investors.
Only think that could make a change is is the fear of lower value if there will be less project in whitelist, but the security and development for thing like this could push the value up.
The security of BOINC could gain more users and make project grow bigger and be a bigger and that could make Gridcoin bigger.
We should work with BOINC project not punish them for what they don´t do, only if they make a really bad.
Outcome of the Gridcoin SSL poll
With 111,304,097 of 760,444,832 (14.637%) of total vote weight participating, the outcome was to NOT enforce SSL encryption as a mandatory whitelist requirement.
Another image courtesy of @sc-steemit:
Cryptocointalk thread continuing the SSL discussion!
looks like miner weight needs to be heavier...
I think this poll should only had been for miners. Investors are not communicating with these sites nor are they sending anything that can be compromised or are affected of projects not being whitelisted because of the lack of SSL.
However, the consensus of the miners are still a No even if you dismiss the Investors shares.
It is true however that many investors that took part in this poll has a larger share per user than the miners. Don't forget about the current polls regarding voting balance. But I still think this needs to be looked at on a deeper level in the future.
I think so to, this would only those who run boinc and not those who are investors.
Only think that could make a change is is the fear of lower value if there will be less project in whitelist, but the security and development for thing like this could push the value up.
The security of BOINC could gain more users and make project grow bigger and be a bigger and that could make Gridcoin bigger.
We should work with BOINC project not punish them for what they don´t do, only if they make a really bad.