We do understand your concern. However, from a game theory perspective, a scammer would stand to gain more if there was no 25 percentile barrier. You can follow the re-distribution as it takes place on the first snapshot date 26.01.2018 Friday 20.00 GMT.
And if it's in my interest to remove this project, why do I need someone to give me money to do it? It is great if people want to unite to push forward their interest, I just don't get the need for transaction part.
But then pay the money to everyone who votes (even if only the people under 25%). I just don't like the idea of paying people to vote for your opinion, no matter how many people you are.
(I'm just here to get my share of the money they send this person)
i don't follow, why would a whale want 1) to remove moo 2) to feed the minnows?
We do understand your concern. However, from a game theory perspective, a scammer would stand to gain more if there was no 25 percentile barrier. You can follow the re-distribution as it takes place on the first snapshot date 26.01.2018 Friday 20.00 GMT.
And if it's in my interest to remove this project, why do I need someone to give me money to do it? It is great if people want to unite to push forward their interest, I just don't get the need for transaction part.
The aim is to reward altruistic behavior and incentivize voting. Not everyone has the same community consciousness. A little nudging goes a long way.
But then pay the money to everyone who votes (even if only the people under 25%). I just don't like the idea of paying people to vote for your opinion, no matter how many people you are.