the -$300 downvotes are the measure to silence me, the calling for people to un-witness me is an attempt to cause more damage and harass.
How am I not the bigger guy? I never flagged him, I never sent 10000 followers to attack him, I never sent endless threats. I presented facts and proof to back it up and I have become primary target #1 for their campaign.
You are convincing but I have been following this guy since he literally made 2 usd and ~50 views per post. It went on for months. What mind thinks of a long con like that?
Too much misinformation here for average Joe. Some influential parties have not yet been revealed I guess.
I am skeptical but I am very open-minded he may be as good as people claim, that's not the issue at hand. The problem is the $380 votes 10 or more times a day from a shared reward pool primarily from one voter.
Well ok, I can see why this may be a problem. But I do not understand why the focus is not on rancho as he is the one with the voting power. I have not been able to find evidence they are operating under the same flag. If anything blockchain info points to the contrary. (Perhaps you can enlighten me)
If Haejin would stop blogging and rancho would instead start upvoting you, would you stop Steeming?
You said he launched and all out war on you with death threats. That's illegal. Can you provide proof?
It's all on the blockchain, there are zillion messages I got here and in private.
Here is an example.
Is @tt-dogg another account of @haejin? Did @haejin personally send you death threats?
Look man, if you really did receive death threats why don't you contact Steemit INC? They have the right to shutdown any account involved in illegal activities on this platform. Also, contact the police.
These flag wars will not solve anything. Both sides act like a bunch of spoiled little kids who argue about who and how they should use the toys they've been given.
Maybe bigger than that just by a bit. I'm just agreeing with @whatsup, perpetuating the drama has little value, especially for the casual reader. But then what, ignore it? No I don't say that so I appreciate your dilemma and know that I do support you, not because of the beef war but because I like your style.
Maybe I could revise and say: continue to be the bigger guy and continue to say what is true. Call silencing silencing. Call denouncements (which is what the witness disenfranchisement call is) denouncements.
I can't post normal posts as he flags them, even posts where I give away money. He completely flagged Steem Poker League so their rewards for their community were zero'd because someone disagreed with him.
If no one says anything, he will take even more than $66K/week, my estimates if he wasn't flagging and was getting a full week worth puts him around $150K-$200K/week for posting charts. This is money taking out of a shared reward pool.