i don't know if fault is the word i'd go with.. maybe just a dick move? 😆 If a business owner wants to refuse service to someone for whatever reason, that should be their right, but others can still see that action as a dick move lol😊 👍
You are viewing a single comment's thread from:
How is a dick-move different to a fault?
Being a dick doesn't mean he nec violated any contractual arrangement. Just because you endorse voluntary exchanges doesn't mean you cannot have an opinion about human action. For example, you have the free speech to say what you want but if someone calls you an asshole, are they at fault? ..well, no—fault of what, really? But might some people think it's a dick move to just call someone an asshole? Maybe.
Doctors refuse service all of the time for different reasons, whether patients be drug seeking they think, or too vulgar or stressful and cause problems for them, it just sucks for the family who might have built up a rapport with that doctor over many years only to have that doctor say adios because they won't get a chickenpox vaccine or something. If they truly care about the welfare of that child then you'd think they'd even more so want to be involved in the healthcare, but I can understand their stance in taking the position that they do.
That explains it, thanks. So dick-move carries no moral status - just some kind of public opinion thingy that we can ignore.
you can ignore whatever floats your boat lol👍 for those who are business owners in the market though, they probably wouldn't want to ignore all feedback from the public :) whether or not that feedback be based on a violation of property rights. 😊