The treatment of cancer is a multi billion industry that employs millions of people worldwide. The Nhs in the UK i have read somewhere is the biggest employer in the UK that is an amazing statistic.
Why then if so much resources and people employed in making us well, are so many people so sick? Like many others i used to believe that the medical profession and the government had our best interests at heart now i know that is not the case.
Why are so many people sick? on medication but not cured? Subject to barbaric procedures proven to not work? the answers to these and other questions is two fold in my opinion.
Firstly money, the pharmaceutical industry is a massive money creating machine created purely for profit. Once you understand the companies that produce drugs are in business to make money it becomes obvious that it is not in those companies interests to make people better.
No it is in those companies interest to have sick people taking their products. The following statement to some will be contentious but here goes i believe that drug companies also create side effects to create other problems that of course need more medication that involves more drugs and by definition more profit. I also believe peoples immune systems are deliberately sabotaged to create ideal conditions for more diseases to develop in the future so that companies can sell even more products.
Don't believe me? Then ask yourself the following question, if not true, why do all medications come with side effects often worse than the original problem? It has never made sense to me why medications always come with side effects its illogical to me.
A few years ago i was diagnosed with very high blood pressure the doctor gave me a prescription that stated the side effects could cause an heart attack or stroke. Guess what i chucked the prescription and did my own research and lowered my blood pressure by a third in less than 3 weeks, maybe a subject for another blog post.
The second reason for so much sickness once again contentious but here goes.The government deliberately allows drug companies to maintain not cure illness to manage the population. The government wouldn't allow/do that would it? i can ear many replying don't believe me then research agenda 21 and you will be horrified about how the United Nations has set out a plan for depopulation read a simplified version here
Agenda 21 as now been superseded by agenda 30 similar goals same agenda depopulation read about it here
http://www.naturalnews.com/051058_2030_Agenda_United_Nations_global_enslavement.html
It takes a leap of faith to realise that your government does not always have your best interests at heart. If some do not make it to pension age or die soon after retiring think how much money the government will save.
The answer to most things in my opinion is to "Always follow the money" that way you will often find the truth. This articles aim was to open minds to think why so many people are sick in other articles i will show natural cures that these vested drug companies and the government do not want you to know.
As an example please read Mollys story our King Charles Cavalier diagnosed with terminal cancer absolutely riddled with it passing blood, the vet said best to put her to sleep, but 4 nearly 5 years later she is still with us the tumour shrunk to hardly anything, full of energy and leading a happy dogs life took her for a walk earlier!! Here is Mollys story
https://steemit.com/health/@kevinace/cancer-cures
Big Pharma is such a huge lobby here in the States. Of course, pharmaceutical companies want to keep their hands in the pockets of the patients. They are behind pushing the mindset that if you are ill, you must take their drugs. They don't want you to eat healthy, using natural remedies such as herbs and roots.
I have MS and the last MS injectable I was on probably caused the skin cancer that will be cut out of my arm next week. There was no warning in the literature I was given with this $6500 a month drug, but the squamous cell carcinoma came up in a 2 week period and I do see a dermatologist regularly. I filled out a MedWatch report and submitted it to the FDA. Research I've done since, shows that same drug has incidence of squamous cell carcinoma, especially in caucasion women in my age group...lovely...PHARMACEUTICAL COMPANIES ONLY CARE ABOUT PROFIT!
Hi Brendad thanks for your comment and touching and horrendous story. I hope you are able to find a cure. Please read Molly's story i am sure it will be beneficial to you link at the bottom of my post.
If i have any health issue i always do a search online (natural cure for?) usually helps think outside the box and take action to help yourself, the system is corrupt and broken. @kevinace
I completely agree, except autoimmune diseases. That is an area that is exceptionally tough. I see all these claims that people have cured their MS. I am sure they were misdiagnosed or they are in remission. We have to understand the human body and how and why it attacks the neurological system.
Hopefully, there will be a cure one day. Until then, we MSer's just have to treat ourselves with kindness.
I don't want to sound insensitive or disrespectful, but I believe you are completely forgetting an important aspect. While there are big companies making huge profits from all kinds or drugs, namely cancer treatments, it's the scientific community and not the CEOs that perform the research, that peer review each others work, that file proposals for clinical trials and for approval from regulating agencies. I can even imagine that some of the member of the scientific community might be corrupted, misguided or ill-intended, but not the entire community. In the end, the scientific method is as transparent and honest as humans can be. I recommend that you read this review on what science has to say about alternative cancer therapies: http://theoncologist.alphamedpress.org/content/9/1/80.full .
This does not mean that there isn't any benefit in following healthy lifestyles, eating well, exercising, etc... But in the end, virtually everyone is susceptible to developing cancer, only with higher or lower odds. I have met people which led incredibly healthy lifestyles and died of cancer nonetheless. Also, I've met people who take care of themselves very poorly and they seem to be hanging on quite well.
You defend a case for suspecting big industries and the government. I don't argue that you shouldn't. But to trust more on poorly documented, unreplicated and allegedly 100% efficient treatments that are only defended by the same people who profit from them, than on scientifically sound and widely tested treatments... Well, that seems a bit odd to me.
Thank you for your comments but i disagree with your analogy, the scientifically sound tests you refer to are usually financed by the same companies who profit from what ever is being tested, example until relatively recently cigarette manufactures argued that cigarettes were perfectly safe and did not cause cancer, they financed the same scientific tests proving cigarettes don't cause cancer lol.
Until the evidence was overwhelming, they still tried to say otherwise. Now that they have been proven to be peddlers of cancer sticks they have gone to third world countries and continue to sell their products and governments allow them to do so even though the evidence is clear.
When i was growing up many mothers were convinced to take thalidomide to prevent morning sickness fortunately my mother did't take it, but it was tested and supposed to be perfectly safe she said.What horrors that caused to many children, but hey it was scientifically safe.
Also according to the governments own statistics over 100,000 people die from prescription drugs every year do you think those people would agree with you that they were subjected to 100% efficient scientifically proven treatments, i don't think so.
The Rockefeller's supplied mustard gas in the first world war to kill people, afterwards to keep the factories in production the same gas was used in chemotherapy which breaks the immune system down and destroys the good with the bad, people recover usually in spite of the treatment not because of it,most die within 5 years.
Dr Leonard Coldwell see link here
as a near 100% success with cancer not using traditional treatments but because he is not promoting big pharma products he as to have bodyguards to protect him as attempts have been made on his life. Why attempts on his life? because he is a threat to big pharma and their profits.Most doctors diagnosed with cancer won't take the same treatment they have to dish out, incidentally if they prescribe anything not on their prescribed list they get struck off and cannot work, so scientifically proven or not they lose their job if don't subscribe drugs on their list.
No if you research eugenics like i have you will come to the conclusion that agenda 21 is real and the governments who have signed up to agenda 21 are complicit in the depopulation agenda.Wish it wasn't true but it is on the evidence of agenda 21 and when you realize that governments do not always have your best interests at heart you will be under no illusions depopulation is real.
Following the money always gives the true answer. Ever wondered why all the monies taken by cancer charities and still the same answer, chemo therapy. If they found a cure for cancer they would be out of business, do you believe its in their interests to find a cure for cancer? @kevinace
I wholeheartedly agree. I recall seeing videos on a doctor using vitamin C intravenously for cancer treatment, getting great results. We are talking very high dosage, not your generic general brand 500 -1000 mg pills. Nor I am talking about these current 2-3 minute YouTube videos talking about it.