But even 15 minutes was too much, IMO, because I think many voters weren't aware of it or didn't have the patience to wait that long before voting on a "hot" post, so they wound up losing curation rewards for no good reason.
Oh! then... "CURATORS" have not the patience to "CURATE" Huh?
And yet, they even think they are entitled to call themselves CONTENT_CURATORS? ¿right?
By chance, is it because nobody here has the slightest idea that The Ancient Art Of Patience is actually implicit and is fundamental in any role that imply curation and is key in every shit that is worth to be curated? Organically & In Person actively curated!
Sheez! look no further in what linguistic, syntax, semantics and etymology has turn out to be in these blockchain days. Holy crap!
@por500bolos What is this sentence?
First of all, I don't think @blocktrades spoke for itself and even if that were the case why should curators be added unnecessary additional constraints? Do you think that the curative work is simple and does not take time to complete? Have you try to do it? Not for 1 easy day but for months? Are you one of those people who think that curation is a due, that if the curators fail to vote one of your posts they have made a professional mistake?
Now, my reading of this sentence is more like that:
On the one hand we are told that our posts can only be voted for 7 days and on the other hand that we have to wait 15 minutes to vote, that it is a beautiful and implacable logic!
On the one hand we are asked to be viral (a pity for all those who spend hours writing very enriching but non-viral posts) and on the other hand to avoid it because we should not vote the first 15 minutes.
The Ancient Art Of Patience has nothing to do here, it's not for people to adapt to Steem but for Steem to adapt to people unless of course it does not want to democratize and remain forever a royalist and elitist niche product.
A good developer is one who does something by thinking for users and not for himself.
In one year, Steem has allowed me to meet very interesting people and I really hope that Dev's team will continue to correct its past mistakes in order to stop this wave of Steemian's departure.
No, I didn't write the 'sentence' like you are quoting it you know?
I've clearly written: Oh! then... "CURATORS" have not the patience to "CURATE" Huh?
Notice the difference? It is a Question not an Affirmation.
Yeah! I know pretty well how you are reading the sentence and everything else in my comment: ¡Evidently out of context! ¿Am I right?
However, I can understand your little mistake. Since I have the hunch, that same as me, english is not your native tongue. Hence, your english is notoriously weirder than mine. And from that fact, the why you are misinterpreting and twisting everything I've meant on my comment.
So, I'm gonna suggest that you read my comment one more time. This time more slowly and with a spanglish dictionary at hand. I bet you will find many new means that escaped your comprehension radar the first time. :)
Lol what ?
...well, just click & learn @howo Hahaha. :p
WARNING: IF YOU REPLY TO THIS ACCOUNT YOU WILL BE FLAGGED, YOUR REP HARMED AND ALL OF YOUR REWARDS REMOVED. DO NOT ENGAGE WITH THE TRASH. YOU HAVE BEEN WARNED