you didnt think you could give me a warning and a link to the rules? What is bad about copy paste with attribution that gives people links directly to what has been said by whom? The title gives the analysis and my take how is that not original ideas with merit? The organization states what the claims are of what happened about an event and what has been most recently reported about it?
What is the basis to determining that any level of copy paste with attribution for the purpose of allowing people to determine things from different sources directly instead of me giving my own account 100% based off what they have said?
These rules state:
"While we don’t look at this from a copyright angle, if you are copying and pasting posts that are not created by you it is still frowned upon. While we may not flag outright on immediate offenses, continued copy & paste posts could be seen as spamming without contributing to the community."
Where are my continued acts? I am willing to follow whatever guidelines the community wants, but when was I put on notice of this? What lacks merit about my analysis in title and the quick links to what I have edited as important parts of the primary sources of news. Outside of the title I also provide analysis with the heading "Update May 2017 Plaintiffs file Appeal for Justice"
@littleboy it seems you are going to destroy my account and not even have a discussion. Seems like you post some cool stuff and may provide useful service to the platform in some ways. I am sorry you want me to leave steemit cause that is what I am planning to do at this point.