Well... I think nobody will answer a "yes" in here hehehe. But anyways you are right the problem here is getting both ends of the rewards! I know that you are talking about comments only but the system was done where no one gets into the hands of the whole poll....your voting power gives half to the author and half is used for your curation rewards. If you are taking both there is something wrong...the system allows but there are some ethical problems in there. But how to deal with it is another problem, downvote them? I understand when the voting power is big, it is interesting to try to make the person stop that. But as user I am more towards not support with my voting mana. Lately, big accounts have been discussing how to change their voting trend, moving into only those who stake Hive. Supporting people who are self-voting could be the same or even worse in my point of view because damages the ecosystem in the same way compared to vote selling.
You are viewing a single comment's thread from:
Lol yeah only one serious yes vote.. and their proposal is not that bad honestly. I was suprised.
So true, the system allows for it. But the way it was designed you are suppose to upvote others not the other way around.