Electricity of the future will not be anything like what the MSM is trying to sell.
If i had to guess, my thought would be that they are trying to program everyone to go in the wrong direction, or the direction towards the most destruction.
Things like nuclear, wind and photovoltaic solar are a waste of money and/or highly destructive to the environment.
The actual energy sources of the near future:
- Geothermal energy
- Ocean wave energy
- Magnet motors
Nuclear
Nuclear is far more destructive than any scientist knows.
All the scientist does is look at the potential for meltdown. (and just for this reason, we should not use this)
The scientists do not look at the destructive energies that are created in a reactor. Life destroying energies.
The metal vessel that contains the reaction has a limited lifespan... it is literally destroyed, like the life is being sucked out of it. Scientists believe this is just from being bombarded with radiation. But it is not.
We will understand this much better in the future.
Right now, i can only tell you it is bad.
And if you do not believe that, then i can show you that the mining for uranium is very environmentally damaging
Ranger Uranium Open Pit Mine
And the nuclear waste is bad. And this waste will last longer than any corporation has ever lasted. Which means that at some point, this waste will just be left somewhere for the next unlucky person to find.
Nuclear energy is the most expensive steam kettle we have ever created. Also the most danger prone.
Wind
Most wind turbines will never produce more energy than was used to create them.
Green energy? Nope, it is just using power from some other place, to make it look green somewhere else.
And then these huge blades, the only thing to do with them is bury them.
No way to recycle them. And using them till they break is very hazardous.
So, they get created, used for a little while, and then buried.
Very wasteful.
Photovoltaic solar
These are good in a few areas.
- Areas that have lots of sunlight. Like the SW deserts of America.
- Areas where utilities are not available.
Else, what is happening is monetary factors are making them look cost efficient in 1st world countries. Subsidies by govern-cements like The US, and having them built in China (exporting the pollution) make them viable. If we paid for everything, solar panels would seen as not very cost efficient.
But the place where photovoltaic panels shine is off grid. Where the price today to string copper/aluminum wires out to the new site costs more than the panels and inverters. And if you paid for the wire and power pole, you would still have to pay for the electricity.
Real, green, continuous power sources
Govern-cement & MSM has done the bidding of the mother WEFers, diverting people's attention from real sources of power, to barely plausible sources. Don't look over here, look over there.
Geothermal... Did you know you have to have a govern-cement permit to work with geothermal energy? Any of the good and easy (near the surface) sites are controlled by the govern-cement, usually through universities. You can't go there and experiment yourself.
Ocean wave enegy... We all know it is there, and powerful / continuous, but anyone wants to do anything with it, Green Peace comes and makes sure that green energy will never exist.
Magnet motors... So, although these things exist, most people believe they do not, because "perpetual motion machine". The patent office has stopped taking patents in this area. One of the most promising fields... and most people think it is a farce.
Real solar... The US has had a program to develop solar energy, like every 20 years... and just before it become a reality, the funding is cut, or made to disappear, or the thing just sits there for students to play with, never coming online.
Each of these is actually quite easy with our current tech level, but we don't do it.
Like, why do we not have electricity producing trash burning plants everywhere?
To me, it is a no brainer.
But if you try to get one of these built, the regulations will stop you.
If not the regulations, then the trash haulers will stop you.
If not them, then the dump owners will stop you.
I have seen this way too many times.
The good idea, the painfully obvious idea, are blocked with every piece of bureaucracy.
You would think this wasn't the case with all the "green energy" push. But it is the case, and all the "green energy" is often green in name only.
Like the electric car producing more pollution before it reaches the showroom than an ICE will produce in its entire life.
your claims about wind and photovoltaic are just wrong. please do some research.
windpower has energy payback times below one year for the whole system, and vestas just announced to build a huge blade recycling plant.
Photovoltaic is by far the cheapest off-grid energy solution and also already one of the cheapest electricity production technologies on-grid. And it will get cheaper every year until soon it will be the cheapest overall.
Sadly subsidies distort the hell out of things versus real world costs. I would be highly suspect of the costs of these things. They may improve in price over time I agree but what is the subsidy that’s added versus what’s the production or material improvement? I would much rather remove the subsidies and let the free market, without the hindrance of the overburden of regulation, come up with better and more cost effective solutions for making the photovoltaic panels.
Wind power is not a useful utility grade power source. It's great for local power production. The real problem is that the utility companies don't want us to make our own power. Using vortex driven kites we can deploy wind power very inexpensively - but utility companies need massive horizontal shaft turbines with tip speeds so high, because the blades are so long, that they require extreme engineering and exotic materials, and that engineering cost and exotic materials are difficult to recycle.
A spinner on a string, however, that can run a house, requires nothing exotic and can be easily repaired and re-used. The overlords do NOT want us making our own inexpensive electricity and keeping our wealth ourselves. That's the real problem with wind and solar - it's not appropriate tech for utility scale power generation.
We can print solar panels today on recycled PET from water bottles that require no enslaved children grubbing coltan out of African mud, but utility companies can't use that tech to make solar panel farms - that themselves eliminate farms. We want solar panels on our roofs we print ourselves. Overlords are losing their wealth and power from appropriate use of wind and solar, and decentralized means of production in every field of industry, and their resistance to decentralization is the real problem we need to overcome.
We need to oppose overlords trying to subjugate us and make us dependent on centralized production of power, food, and every product we use, and we can do that not by marching in the street, but by learning how to deploy vortex kites, print solar panels on PET, and getting a 3D printer to make our own stuff instead of buying everything from corporations that feed overlords.
The OVERLORDS are the actual problem. CO2 is fertilizer, not sky destroying pollution. As you point out, education is the key to prosperity, and that is why we are fed lies instead of facts about climate, pollution, and decentralization, which disperses the wealth of civilization across the population, instead of centralization, which concentrates wealth in the walled gardens of oligarchs and overlords.
Choose freedom instead of dependence on overlords for your very life.
Without subsidies, photovoltaic takes about 20 years to break even.
And that is almost the life of many panels.
And this is what you are call "the cheapest"?
I hope that the huge blade recycling plant actually recycles these things, but i am not going to hold my breath. Too many bate and switches before.
no, not I am calling this, but the IEA.. International Energy Agency... https://www.iea.org/energy-system/renewables/solar-pv "Despite increases in investment costs due to rising commodity prices, utility-scale solar PV is the least costly option for new electricity generation in a significant majority of countries worldwide. Distributed solar PV, such as rooftop solar on buildings, is also set for faster growth because of higher retail electricity prices and growing policy support."
and here is the corresponding data:
Unfortunately, the IEA doesn't even acknowledge any of the better technology.
And these number include the back end subsidies. Where we are just exporting pollution to 3rd world nations.
I do not agree with how they have broken down these numbers, and the BIG thing that is missing is what any of these categories mean.
Is that a giant windmill that will never pay for the diesel used to make it, or a little home windmill , that if it doesn't get destroyed in a wind storm, will pay for itself in a year... as long as you already have a system that can store the spikey electrical production?
Most technologies have applications they are appropriate for, and applications they are not. Nuclear, for example, isn't appropriate for a car. Infernal combustion is a more appropriate technology for cars. However, all nuclear isn't the same. I am sure you'll disagree for reasons you can't articulate, but molten salt reactors are inherently immune to meltdowns, because if something goes wrong the salt freezes and the reactor ceases operation by default.
You're not wrong about open pit mining or nuclear waste. However, these problems aren't necessarily impossible to overcome. Mines can be remediated and waste can be injected into the mantle. These things cost money, and that's the real problem - cost cutting. As is obvious to anyone familiar with planned obsolescence, cutting such costs ends up costing more in the long run, but that cost is income to manufacturers that are then able to sell a replacement item, or remediate the toxic mine after it starts poisoning a local school, etc.
Solar and wind are great tech, they're just not appropriate for commercial power production, while nuclear is. Solar and wind are great for decentralized power production, for homeowners or farmers to produce power where it's needed, but corporations don't want anyone producing their own power.
Again, the problem isn't the tech, it's the politics. They screech about CO2 causing global warming, which is completely false, and downplay the fact that CO2 is a critical limiting factor in ecological fecundity such that having 10x CO2 in the atmosphere (which has been the situation for most of the existence of live on the Earth) would make nature much more robust, and farming far more profitable. It would be facile to feed ourselves - and they absolutely cannot let abundance enable us to be independent of their expensive products.
The real problem we face is overlords. We solve that by appropriately applying technology. We print solar panels on recycled PET. We manufacture our own products locally, and cut corporations out of the economy whenever we can. Everyone should have a 3D printer for making their household products. 3D printers can make clothes, dishes, and all the little doodads and switch parts we depend on today, for example in making 3D printers. By sharing the files we can eliminate vast parasitic flows of wealth that feed overlords, and pool the wealth in our own communities.
When we have nominal wealth we aren't going to tolerate unremediated open pit mines polluting the drinking water. Those mines will be remediated. We solve the source of the problem, overlords, first, and the knock on effects get solved with ease thereafter.
Thanks!
Most people who can see auras, see nuclear power plants with all kinds of dark, negative energy flowing around them. This could be that these things attract negative entities. (there are stories of such in old texts) It could be from these things destroying space in their vicinity. For this reason, i believe that we should not have nuclear power plants... at all.
But, i can reach the same conclusion looking at all the destruction to mine and enrich plutonium. And then the potential destruction if anything goes wrong doesn't help the story any. Add on top of that, the waste containment and disposal, and i am firmly against this.
If these negatives weren't in play, i would totally agree with you. Nuclear is great for a power plant, and ICE is far better in cars.
Did you know that before photovoltaic panels there was solar power? This company had little trough mirrors making steam running a little steam engine. The only problem with it is that it need more and constant maintenance.
I have thought of plans to go against the overlords. A charismatic person should be able to get a huge number of people behind them to actually create green, continuous energy. But, in this path, you usually find it crash because of greed and death.
They just need to chant and wave amethyst crystals, burn some sage, and we're all good.
Solar thermal power has been used for millennia. It was used to light ships afire back in the day. However, it's still not possible to print bronze mirrors today, but we can print solar panels.
Regarding hordes of followers, this is a problem for people that want to lead and rule. I just want my neighbors to be free and prosperous. I don't want to rule them.