Sort:  
 5 years ago  Reveal Comment

Those links don't represent reality. 800 degrees would've fried every single person in those images. If they are not on the "surface", where are they?

Where is this "super hot surface"?

Why are you throwing around links and numbers that have no bearing on reality?

Even if the thermal images are correct (which likely aren't especially since they are from September 16 to 21), it would not be due to conventional heat since no one was burnt and there were millions of unburnt paper throughout.

 4 years ago (edited) Reveal Comment

Where is this "molten steel"? And more importantly how would "molten anything" turn most of all 7 towers into dust leaving very little rubble, seismic impact, noise, or projectiles?

Where are these "pools of molten steel"?

And why are you appealing to bogus authority figures, "experts", and why are you propping up controlled opposition "AE911Truth"?

Lastly, are you going to provide any evidence?

The evidence of the towers turning to dust is right in front of your eyes, see my 9/11 video you are commenting on...


FYI I have covered the molten disinfo in my video 3 years ago, and you can see it at the 2:49:00 mark of my Part 6 video: https://youtu.be/aDWgsVSo4Oc?t=10139


As for the images I sent earlier, they were on 9/11: https://www.flickr.com/photos/rudis323/35365557215/

And the onus is on you to find the 800 degree C pools which were measured a week after 9/11, and you can't just make up claims that "they were destroying the crime scene". The photo I sent had pools of water. If the temperature were even remotely hot the water would boil.

There are many videos just moments after the twin towers fell in which people are walking around just fine right beside the remains and right next to the exact location of the towers. In fact there were survivors stuck inside a Stairwell right next to the towers,and they were stuck for hours. (See the 27:00 mark of the video to see people casually walking around the North Tower).

Dear @valued-customer, I propose you a short exercise of CRITICAL THOUGHT in three questions, simple and effective:

  1. Have you ever seen the light emitted by thermite in action and compared it with the videos of the disintegration of the twin towers? What are the obvious differences?
  2. Given the enormous heat needed to disintegrate everything (steel, concrete, glass and various contents in the towers), can you tell me how many people were hospitalized on September 11, 2001 following the destructive event of the World Trade Center in New York?
  3. Is thermite able to transform the 107-storey structure into fine dust, so much so as to leave the survivors unscathed (and not burned) on a third-floor staircase and not crushed by 107 floors that a few seconds earlier were above them nor burnt to death by the very high heat theorized to generate the "mythical molten steel"?

If you prefer to believe (presumed) authority, you are free to do so... but do the beliefs spread by AE911Truth go against the logic and evidence of the facts?

@forensic911 I wouldn't worry too much about the disinfo agent "valued-customer". He is just here to push the same usual bogus controlled opposition lies.

 4 years ago  Reveal Comment

You're still pushing the bogus non-existent explosives and AE911truth disinfo?

This isn't the place for your lies and willful ignorance.

 4 years ago  Reveal Comment

Thanks for sharing your views on 9/11. As for my view, the technical details are everything. 9/11 is about the suppression of free energy technology, holographic projection technology, and weather control technology. The non-existent thermite and non-existent explosives disinformation as well as the non-existent and irrelevant molten nonsense are just attempts to steer the truth movement into dead ends and make it easy for the mainstream media to debunk and laugh at.

 4 years ago  Reveal Comment